Assignment 2: Getting the Right Design

Overview

Even for a well-understood, well-motivated problem, choosing a design to invest time into is a difficult and laborious process. This group assignment, spanning multiple weeks of the course, tackles the problem of selecting the right design through design research, task development, generating multiple potential designs, and finally selecting a design to pursue.

This assignment is worth 21% of your overall course grade:

The content of Assignment 2i: Presentation is worth 5% of your overall course grade.

Your delivery of a presentation this quarter is worth 2% of your overall course grade.

Milestones

This is a group assignment, consisting of nine milestones.

Project Description

In this assignment, you will brainstorm a large set of possible tasks and design ideas for your project. You will then conduct design research to learn more about your problem and the current practices of people who might use your design. You will draw upon the ideas developed in your brainstorming and the observations made in your design research to help develop a set of potential tasks your design might support. You will next sketch how a set of initial designs might support those tasks. You will choose a design to pursue in the remainder of the course and storyboard the details of your design in the context of important tasks. Finally, you will present your design process in a report and presentation.

More specifically, you will do the following:

  1. Generate ideas for potential problems, tasks, features, and interactions using a group ideation exercise.

    (Assignment 2a)

  2. Conduct design research (e.g., contextual inquiry, interviews, observations) to learn from at least three people who might use your design.

    (Assignment 2b), (Assignment 2c), (Assignment 2d)

  3. Develop six tasks that might be performed with your design.

    Select these to capture the important aspects of the problem you are solving and to provide coverage of the designs you will explore. Create these based on your observations and analyses of existing tasks as well as your vision for new tasks enabled by potential designs. Remember that tasks say what is accomplished, while leaving open how to accomplish it.

    As you progress through your project, you can and should consider revising your tasks. Expect to refine or change your tasks as your understanding of the problem matures or according to feedback you receive. The tasks you report in this assignment therefore must be appropriate but are not necessarily final.

    (Assignment 2e)

  4. Brainstorm and sketch three very different initial designs for your interface. Each design should support four of your tasks.

    Do not illustrate the entire design, but instead sketch key aspects needed to illustrate the functionality. These should be rough sketches on paper (i.e., not digital mockups), including illustrations of their relations (e.g., arrows showing transitions and relationships).

    The purpose of these sketches is to explore the design space before you lock yourself into a single design. They must demonstrate significant consideration of substantially different approaches to your problem.

    (Assignment 2f)

  5. From your sketches, select one design to pursue for the remainder of the quarter and two tasks that emphasize critical functionality of your design. These tasks should be non-trivial, critical to solving your problem, and should emphasize long-lived or repeated activities. In contrast, a one-time login screen for a social networking application is not worth being the focus of your project, does not define your project functionality, and is not sufficiently interesting.

    Storyboard your chosen design for your chosen tasks, illustrating how the tasks are accomplished in your design.

    (Assignment 2g)

  6. Summarize your design process in a report and presentation.

    (Assignment 2h), (Assignment 2i)

Deliverables

2a: Project Ideation

Due: Completed in Section on January 18, 2019.

The goal of this milestone is to begin thinking about how to plan effective design research to inform your design process.

Generate 5 to 10 different ideas related to each of the following aspects of your project proposal:

  • Forms: types of technology on which a design might be developed (e.g., wearable sensors, watch/phone/tablet, desktop, appliances or other artifacts in the environment).
  • Data: types of data a design might track or help a person track.
  • Tasks: what a person might accomplish with a design.
  • Features: a specific capability a design might have.
  • Social Interactions: types of social interactions and situations a design might engage or support.

We will provide large sheets of paper. Divide a large sheet of paper into 32 squares, each approximately 2in by 2in. Sketch your ideas, one in each square. Each idea should be either a quick doodle with a caption or a one-sentence idea. A person familiar with your project but not in your group should be able to understand the idea each sketch conveys.

The goal is to begin exploring the space of possibilities, not attempting to polish some individual possibility. Focus on the quantity of ideas, not the quality of any one idea. You may include ideas from existing products. No two ideas should be alike. When you get stuck, find a context to inspire new ideas.

Given a space of possible directions, your project needs to begin to gather information on how to generate and consider ideas. Following up on the above, additionally brainstorm:

  • People: types of people you might work with to learn more.
  • Focus: on what parts of the problem you might focus your learning.

Submission

At the end of section, capture and submit an image of your brainstorm.

Submit via Canvas here:

https://canvas.uw.edu/courses/1254716/assignments/4621054

You will be able to take your paper with you, and you should continue brainstorming throughout your project.

Contribution Statement

This submission does not require a team contribution statement.

Grading

This milestone will be graded on a scale of 3 points based on participation in generating ideas during the brainstorming exercise.

2b: Design Research Plan

Due: Uploaded Monday, January 21, 2019.

The goal of this milestone is to develop an initial plan for your design research.

In one paragraph, describe the people who might use your design and other stakeholders to consider in your design. Among potential stakeholders, describe the participants you plan to pursue, including such details as their background and the environment where you will examine their current practices. Give enough information to convince us that you can actually find and engage with your target participants in the next week.

  • For example, your target participants should not be "doctors" but instead a specific group of doctors (e.g., Family Practitioners in the UW Roosevelt Clinic). If gaining access to the target participants is non-trivial (e.g., as with busy doctors), describe the steps you have already taken to gain access and your plans to recover if you are unable to gain access. Indicate when you will be conducting your design research, being as specific as possible.

In another paragraph, describe the specific design research methods you will use to engage with and learn from these people. The most common method used is contextual inquiry with three participants. However, we encourage you to propose alternative or additional design research methods according to your needs. Please be as specific as possible, providing relevant details for you proposed methods. For example:

  • If you propose contextual inquiries, discuss current behaviors you want to observe and your planned focus.
  • If you propose interviews, discuss the types of questions you plan to explore.
  • If you propose a diary study, discuss what type of data you plan to ask participants to bring or collect.

On a second page, provide more detail regarding your primary proposed method. For example:

  • If you propose contextual inquiries, enumerate what activities you intend to observe, what focus you intend to bring to observation of each activity, how you will approach the development of partnership, and any other strategies you intend to pursue for gaining insight through your observations.

  • If you propose interviews, give an example set of talking points, such as these (note these are all longer than a page, but intended to illustrate a thorough script):

  • If you propose a diary study, give details of what and how you will ask participants to diary.

Samples from Prior Offerings

The request for a second page of more detail regarding the proposed primary method was new in the Autumn 2017 offering. It does not appear in prior samples.

The goal in soliciting this additional detail is to:

  • Encourage you to work through more of the details.
  • Help improve those details through critique and peer feedback prior to your initial design research.

Samples from prior offerings include:

Note that details of assignments may have changed since prior offerings, so their reports may not map to the current project. Also note these samples are intended to illustrate a variety of approaches, none of which is intended to be ideal or exemplary. Be sure to understand and carefully consider project requirements and feedback from the course staff in the context of your own work.

Submission

No more than two pages of text in PDF format. Submit via Canvas here:

https://canvas.uw.edu/courses/1254716/assignments/4621058

Be prepared to discuss your design research with other teams and the course staff.

Contribution Statement

This requirement was not included in prior offerings. It does not appear in prior samples.

Your submission must also include a team contribution statement, as an additional page in your submission.

This statement should indicate the name of each member of your team, the percentage of effort in this specific assignment that each member contributed, and the specific activities in this specific assignment that each member contributed.

An example contribution statement is:

  • Name 1: 40%, researched the background of the problem, outlined the content of the document, wrote the first version of one paragraph, selected the images to be included
  • Name 2: 15%, conducted 3 interviews and took notes
  • Name 3: 20%, wrote the first version of the background section, made sure the final document was submitted
  • Name 4: 25%, organized the group meeting, conducted 3 interviews (with Name 2), put together the first draft of the document's results section

This contribution statement is intended to support your own reflection as a team as well as the staff's awareness of your efforts. You should therefore discuss and agree upon this statement of what each of you contributed and how much this contributed to the overall assignment. The staff does not expect each person to contribute equally to each assignment, but you should work as a team to support each other, and we expect all members will contribute over the quarter. The staff also understands that percentages are incomplete and subjective, so we gather them only as a summary indication and will not use them directly in any grade calculation.

Grading

This milestone will be graded on a scale of 10 points:

  1. Feasibility and Specificity of People: (3 points)
  2. Feasibility and Specificity of Design Methods: (3 points)
  3. Protocol: (2 points)
  4. Clarity and Presentation: (2 points)

2c: Design Research Check-In

Due: Uploaded Thursday, January 24, 2019.

The goal of this milestone is to begin your design research, reflect on what you observe and learn, then update your plans for additional design research.

Complete design research with at least one participant prior to this check-in. You hopefully learned something about the needs of people who might use your design, but also about effectively conducting your design research.

Describe your first design research participant and your findings:

  • Who you observed or interviewed, their background, and the environment.
  • What did you learn?
  • What tasks, problems, or opportunities did you uncover?
  • Did you encounter any difficulties establishing rapport or getting the information you need?

Discuss what remains to be pursued in your additional design research. We fully expect changes will be necessary, as design research can be difficult to get right and often important topics are left unresolved.

  • What are your plans for the remaining participants?
  • How do you plan to change your design research plan based on what you learned with your first participant?

Samples from Prior Offerings

Samples from prior offerings include:

Note that details of assignments may have changed since prior offerings, so their reports may not map to the current project. Also note these samples are intended to illustrate a variety of approaches, none of which is intended to be ideal or exemplary. Be sure to understand and carefully consider project requirements and feedback from the course staff in the context of your own work.

Submission

No more than one page of text in PDF format. Submit via Canvas here:

https://canvas.uw.edu/courses/1254716/assignments/4621059

Names of participants should be replaced with pseudonyms in all documents. It is important to protect participant anonymity, even in the case that reporting seems harmless.

Be prepared to discuss your design research with other teams and the course staff.

Contribution Statement

This requirement was not included in prior offerings. It does not appear in prior samples.

Your submission must also include a team contribution statement, as an additional page in your submission.

This statement should indicate the name of each member of your team, the percentage of effort in this specific assignment that each member contributed, and the specific activities in this specific assignment that each member contributed.

An example contribution statement is:

  • Name 1: 40%, researched the background of the problem, outlined the content of the document, wrote the first version of one paragraph, selected the images to be included
  • Name 2: 15%, conducted 3 interviews and took notes
  • Name 3: 20%, wrote the first version of the background section, made sure the final document was submitted
  • Name 4: 25%, organized the group meeting, conducted 3 interviews (with Name 2), put together the first draft of the document's results section

This contribution statement is intended to support your own reflection as a team as well as the staff's awareness of your efforts. You should therefore discuss and agree upon this statement of what each of you contributed and how much this contributed to the overall assignment. The staff does not expect each person to contribute equally to each assignment, but you should work as a team to support each other, and we expect all members will contribute over the quarter. The staff also understands that percentages are incomplete and subjective, so we gather them only as a summary indication and will not use them directly in any grade calculation.

Grading

This milestone will be graded on a scale of 8 points:

  1. Information from the First Participant: (4 points)
  2. Plan for Remaining Participants: (2 points)
  3. Clarity and Presentation: (2 points)

2d: Design Research Review

Due: Uploaded Monday, January 28, 2019.

The goal of this milestone is to reflect on what you observed and learned in your design research, organizing observations around themes to tasks to help inform your design.

Themes

Complete design research with a total of at least three participants. Discuss your process and what you learned:

  • Who you observed or interviewed, their background, and the environment.
  • Note anything unique about each participant and comment on the rationale behind these observations.

Across your participants, we expect some emergence of common themes, problems, and practices.

  • Identify high-level themes and problems the participants share in their practices.
  • Do these themes, problems, and practices suggest tasks that are important to design for?

If you are having trouble identifying high-level themes, problems, and practices, it may indicate a need to develop additional understanding through more design research. Because your findings at this point are critical to setting a foundation for your project, ensure your design research has provided you the insights and perspective you need to proceed.

Task Analysis Questions

Informed by your design research, provide brief answers to the following questions. These should help you begin to identify tasks essential to your design.

  1. Who is going to use the design?
  2. What tasks do they now perform?
  3. What tasks are desired?
  4. How are the tasks learned?
  5. Where are the tasks performed?
  6. What is the relationship between the person and data?
  7. What other tools does the person have?
  8. How do people communicate with each other?
  9. How often are the tasks performed?
  10. What are the time constraints on the tasks?
  11. What happens when things go wrong?

Samples from Prior Offerings

Samples from prior offerings include:

Note that details of assignments may have changed since prior offerings, so their reports may not map to the current project. Also note these samples are intended to illustrate a variety of approaches, none of which is intended to be ideal or exemplary. Be sure to understand and carefully consider project requirements and feedback from the course staff in the context of your own work.

Submission

No more than four pages of text in PDF format:

  • summary of key findings or takeaways (one paragraph at beginning)
  • design research participants (less than one page)
  • design research themes (less than one page)
  • task analysis questions (less than two pages)

Submit via Canvas here:

https://canvas.uw.edu/courses/1254716/assignments/4621060

Names of participants should be replaced with pseudonyms in all documents. It is important to protect participant anonymity, even in the case that reporting seems harmless.

Be prepared to discuss your design research with other teams and the course staff.

Contribution Statement

This requirement was not included in prior offerings. It does not appear in prior samples.

Your submission must also include a team contribution statement, as an additional page in your submission.

This statement should indicate the name of each member of your team, the percentage of effort in this specific assignment that each member contributed, and the specific activities in this specific assignment that each member contributed.

An example contribution statement is:

  • Name 1: 40%, researched the background of the problem, outlined the content of the document, wrote the first version of one paragraph, selected the images to be included
  • Name 2: 15%, conducted 3 interviews and took notes
  • Name 3: 20%, wrote the first version of the background section, made sure the final document was submitted
  • Name 4: 25%, organized the group meeting, conducted 3 interviews (with Name 2), put together the first draft of the document's results section

This contribution statement is intended to support your own reflection as a team as well as the staff's awareness of your efforts. You should therefore discuss and agree upon this statement of what each of you contributed and how much this contributed to the overall assignment. The staff does not expect each person to contribute equally to each assignment, but you should work as a team to support each other, and we expect all members will contribute over the quarter. The staff also understands that percentages are incomplete and subjective, so we gather them only as a summary indication and will not use them directly in any grade calculation.

Grading

This milestone will be graded on a scale of 12 points:

  1. Description of Participants : (3 points)
  2. Quality of Themes Developed: (3 points)
  3. Answers to Task Analysis Questions: (4 points)
  4. Clarity and Presentation: (2 points)

2e: Task Review

Due: Uploaded Thursday, Janurary 31, 2019.

The goal of this milestone is to develop a set of tasks that you will explore in a set of potential designs.

Building on what you learned in your design research, design six tasks that you believe are integral to your overall design goal:

  • You should include existing tasks (i.e., tasks people already do) and new tasks (i.e., tasks that will be enabled by your design).
  • These should be real world tasks that have details (e.g., instead of "programming a DVR", details like "programming a DVR to record the Simpsons on Sundays").
  • These tasks should not have any specific relation to the exact design sketches you will brainstorm next.
  • Your six tasks should span a wide range of functionality and difficulty, from easy to hard tasks.

Each task should be described in text. Tasks say what is accomplished, leaving open how to accomplish it. Be sure that your task conveys a problem and what is accomplished, rather than a step-by-step walkthrough of scenario with a specific design.

Samples from Prior Offerings

Samples from prior offerings include:

Note that details of assignments may have changed since prior offerings, so their reports may not map to the current project. Also note these samples are intended to illustrate a variety of approaches, none of which is intended to be ideal or exemplary. Be sure to understand and carefully consider project requirements and feedback from the course staff in the context of your own work.

Submission

No more than two pages of text in PDF format:

  • six task descriptions (one paragraph each)

Submit via Canvas here:

https://canvas.uw.edu/courses/1254716/assignments/4621063

Be prepared to discuss your design research with other teams and the course staff.

Contribution Statement

This requirement was not included in prior offerings. It does not appear in prior samples.

Your submission must also include a team contribution statement, as an additional page in your submission.

This statement should indicate the name of each member of your team, the percentage of effort in this specific assignment that each member contributed, and the specific activities in this specific assignment that each member contributed.

An example contribution statement is:

  • Name 1: 40%, researched the background of the problem, outlined the content of the document, wrote the first version of one paragraph, selected the images to be included
  • Name 2: 15%, conducted 3 interviews and took notes
  • Name 3: 20%, wrote the first version of the background section, made sure the final document was submitted
  • Name 4: 25%, organized the group meeting, conducted 3 interviews (with Name 2), put together the first draft of the document's results section

This contribution statement is intended to support your own reflection as a team as well as the staff's awareness of your efforts. You should therefore discuss and agree upon this statement of what each of you contributed and how much this contributed to the overall assignment. The staff does not expect each person to contribute equally to each assignment, but you should work as a team to support each other, and we expect all members will contribute over the quarter. The staff also understands that percentages are incomplete and subjective, so we gather them only as a summary indication and will not use them directly in any grade calculation.

Grading

This milestone will be graded on a scale of 8 points:

  1. Each of 6 Tasks: (1 point)
  2. Clarity and Presentation: (2 points)

2f: Design Check-In ("3x4")

Due: Uploaded Monday, February 4, 2019.

The goal of this milestone is to develop distinct design ideas that address your tasks.

You have identified and described six important tasks for your design problem. You will now brainstorm and sketch three very different initial designs for your interface:

  • Each design should support four of your tasks, but they do not necessarily need to all support the same four tasks.
  • Sketch key aspects needed to illustrate the functionality in your four tasks. A design may imply additional tasks, but do not illustrate the entire design.
  • These should be rough sketches on paper (i.e., not digital mockups), including illustrations of their relations (e.g., arrows showing transitions and relationships).

The purpose of these sketches is to explore the design space before you lock yourself into a single design. They must demonstrate significant consideration of substantially different approaches to your problem.

Samples from Prior Offerings

Samples from prior offerings include:

Note that details of assignments may have changed since prior offerings, so their reports may not map to the current project. Also note these samples are intended to illustrate a variety of approaches, none of which is intended to be ideal or exemplary. Be sure to understand and carefully consider project requirements and feedback from the course staff in the context of your own work.

Submission

No more than three pages of text in PDF format:

  • six task descriptions (one paragraph each, updated as needed from prior assignment)
  • for each of three initial designs
    • the high-level idea of the design (one paragraph)
    • scanned images of the design (sketches, not digital mockups)
    • how to complete each the four sketched tasks (e.g., a list of steps, one or two sentences per task)

Images do not count against your page limit, and are therefore effectively free. You should embed images throughout your PDF, keeping them near the text that references them. The limit applies to the approximate amount of text you would have if all images were removed.

Submit via Canvas here:

https://canvas.uw.edu/courses/1254716/assignments/4621064

Be prepared to discuss your designs with other teams and the course staff.

Contribution Statement

This requirement was not included in prior offerings. It does not appear in prior samples.

Your submission must also include a team contribution statement, as an additional page in your submission.

This statement should indicate the name of each member of your team, the percentage of effort in this specific assignment that each member contributed, and the specific activities in this specific assignment that each member contributed.

An example contribution statement is:

  • Name 1: 40%, researched the background of the problem, outlined the content of the document, wrote the first version of one paragraph, selected the images to be included
  • Name 2: 15%, conducted 3 interviews and took notes
  • Name 3: 20%, wrote the first version of the background section, made sure the final document was submitted
  • Name 4: 25%, organized the group meeting, conducted 3 interviews (with Name 2), put together the first draft of the document's results section

This contribution statement is intended to support your own reflection as a team as well as the staff's awareness of your efforts. You should therefore discuss and agree upon this statement of what each of you contributed and how much this contributed to the overall assignment. The staff does not expect each person to contribute equally to each assignment, but you should work as a team to support each other, and we expect all members will contribute over the quarter. The staff also understands that percentages are incomplete and subjective, so we gather them only as a summary indication and will not use them directly in any grade calculation.

Grading

This milestone will be graded on a scale of 10 points:

  1. Six Task Descriptions: (2 points)
  2. Each of 3 Designs: (2 points)
  3. Clarity and Presentation: (2 points)

2g: Design Review ("1x2")

Due: Uploaded Thursday, February 7, 2019.

The goal of this milestone is to choose a design idea to pursue in the remainder of this course.

From your design sketches, select one design that you will refine in the remainder of this course. Then select two tasks that will be the focus of your design refinement. The selected tasks need to be representative of the experience of using your design.

Prepare one paragraph describing why you selected the design you did. Draw upon feedback from critiques and data from your design research.

  • Why this design and these tasks?
  • What makes the design better suited to the people for whom you are targeting your design?
  • Why are these tasks more compelling than the others?

Convey a strong understanding of which design you chose, which tasks you chose, and why you chose them.

Then create a storyboard of each task for your selected design. These should be done on paper, then scanned (i.e., do not create or recreate them in a drawing package). They should clearly indicate the functionality of the design and what the interface will be like, conveying the major aspects of the design in enough detail that a person not in your group can understand how the design supports each task. As needed, add descriptions that explicitly reference the storyboard, add more sketches, or annotate them in multiple colors.

Samples from Prior Offerings

Samples from prior offerings include:

Note that details of assignments may have changed since prior offerings, so their reports may not map to the current project. Also note these samples are intended to illustrate a variety of approaches, none of which is intended to be ideal or exemplary. Be sure to understand and carefully consider project requirements and feedback from the course staff in the context of your own work.

Submission

No more than one page of text in PDF format:

  • discussion of your design and task choices (one paragraph)
  • scanned images of your storyboards and associated descriptions

Images do not count against your page limit, and are therefore effectively free. You should embed images throughout your PDF, keeping them near the text that references them. The limit applies to the approximate amount of text you would have if all images were removed.

Submit via Canvas here:

https://canvas.uw.edu/courses/1254716/assignments/4621065

Be prepared to discuss your choices and storyboards with other teams and the course staff.

Contribution Statement

This requirement was not included in prior offerings. It does not appear in prior samples.

Your submission must also include a team contribution statement, as an additional page in your submission.

This statement should indicate the name of each member of your team, the percentage of effort in this specific assignment that each member contributed, and the specific activities in this specific assignment that each member contributed.

An example contribution statement is:

  • Name 1: 40%, researched the background of the problem, outlined the content of the document, wrote the first version of one paragraph, selected the images to be included
  • Name 2: 15%, conducted 3 interviews and took notes
  • Name 3: 20%, wrote the first version of the background section, made sure the final document was submitted
  • Name 4: 25%, organized the group meeting, conducted 3 interviews (with Name 2), put together the first draft of the document's results section

This contribution statement is intended to support your own reflection as a team as well as the staff's awareness of your efforts. You should therefore discuss and agree upon this statement of what each of you contributed and how much this contributed to the overall assignment. The staff does not expect each person to contribute equally to each assignment, but you should work as a team to support each other, and we expect all members will contribute over the quarter. The staff also understands that percentages are incomplete and subjective, so we gather them only as a summary indication and will not use them directly in any grade calculation.

Grading

This milestone will be graded on a scale of 8 points:

  1. Rationale for Choosing a Design Focus and Tasks: (2 points)
  2. Each of 2 Storyboards: (2 points)
  3. Clarity and Presentation: (2 points)

2h: Final Report

Due: Uploaded Tuesday, February 12, 2019.

The goal of this milestone is to communicate the design research that motivates your design.

Prepare a report documenting your process of getting the right design. Your report should follow the outline below, and will be graded using the guidelines that follow. The provided page allocations are estimates, intended to help convey how to divide up the space.

If you completed all of your milestones above, you will have much of the content for this report. But it is critical that you revise and update that content. You have received extensive feedback throughout your design process, and evaluation of your report will include how you have addressed and incorporated that feedback to improve relative to your prior milestones.

  1. Title

    A short, creative, and marketable title capturing the key idea.

  2. Each Team Member’s Name

  3. Problem and Solution Overview: (1 paragraph)

    A concise statement of the problem you are tackling and a brief synopsis of your proposed solution.

  4. Design Research Goals, Stakeholders, and Participants: (1 page)

    Describe your design research, including the participants, their background, and their environment.

    Describe why you chose the specific methods and participants in your design research.

  5. Design Research Results and Themes: (1 page)

    Discuss common themes, problems, and practices that emerged in your design research.

    Include any updated themes that emerged when considering your design research in your design process.

  6. Answers to Task Analysis Questions: (2 pages)

    Provide brief answers to the task analysis questions.

    These should be updated according to your evolved understanding of the problem and your design.

  7. Proposed Design Sketches - "3x4": (1 page)

    Present scanned images of your three initial designs in the context of their four tasks.

    Include one paragraph for each design, discussing how it supports your tasks.

    Include one paragraph discussing your choice of design and tasks to further pursue.

  8. Written Scenarios - "1x2": (1 page)

    Convert your two tasks into written scenarios for your design. Scenarios include the steps a person will go through to accomplish the task, including references to your design.

    Scenarios do not need to detail every little step, but should be realistic, should be dependent upon the design you have chosen, should appropriately reference elements of your design, and should communicate how a person will accomplish the task using your design.

  9. Storyboards of the Selected Design

    Include updated storyboards of your design. Reference these appropriately in your scenarios.

Ensure your report is appropriately clear and easy to read. This includes:

  • text should be clear and concise
  • use section headings as appropriate
  • include images in the body of the write-up with appropriate figure numbers and captions
  • refer to the figures in the body of your text
  • check for typos, spelling, and grammar errors

Be sure your presentation looks good:

  • choose appropriate colors, fonts, and styles
  • make liberal use of whitespace

Samples from Prior Offerings

Samples from prior offerings include:

Note that details of assignments may have changed since prior offerings, so their reports may not map to the current project. Also note these samples are intended to illustrate a variety of approaches, none of which is intended to be ideal or exemplary. Be sure to understand and carefully consider project requirements and feedback from the course staff in the context of your own work.

Submission

No more than eight pages of text in PDF format, following the above outline.

Images do not count against your page limit, and are therefore effectively free. You should embed images throughout your PDF, keeping them near the text that references them. The limit applies to the approximate amount of text you would have if all images were removed.

Submit via Canvas here:

https://canvas.uw.edu/courses/1254716/assignments/4621310

Names of participants should be replaced with pseudonyms in all documents. It is important to protect participant anonymity, even in the case that reporting seems harmless.

Contribution Statement

This requirement was not included in prior offerings. It does not appear in prior samples.

Your submission must also include a team contribution statement, as an additional page in your submission.

This statement should indicate the name of each member of your team, the percentage of effort in this specific assignment that each member contributed, and the specific activities in this specific assignment that each member contributed.

An example contribution statement is:

  • Name 1: 40%, researched the background of the problem, outlined the content of the document, wrote the first version of one paragraph, selected the images to be included
  • Name 2: 15%, conducted 3 interviews and took notes
  • Name 3: 20%, wrote the first version of the background section, made sure the final document was submitted
  • Name 4: 25%, organized the group meeting, conducted 3 interviews (with Name 2), put together the first draft of the document's results section

This contribution statement is intended to support your own reflection as a team as well as the staff's awareness of your efforts. You should therefore discuss and agree upon this statement of what each of you contributed and how much this contributed to the overall assignment. The staff does not expect each person to contribute equally to each assignment, but you should work as a team to support each other, and we expect all members will contribute over the quarter. The staff also understands that percentages are incomplete and subjective, so we gather them only as a summary indication and will not use them directly in any grade calculation.

Grading

This report will be graded on a scale of 25 points:

  1. Title: (1 point)
  2. Team Member Names: (1 point)
  3. Problem and Solution Overview: (2 points)
  4. Design Research Goals, Stakeholders, and Participants: (2 points)
  5. Design Research Results and Themes: (3 points)
  6. Answers to Task Analysis Questions: (3 points)
  7. Proposed Design Sketches - "3x4": (3 points)
  8. Written Scenarios - "1x2": (3 points)
  9. Storyboards of the Selected Design: (3 points)
  10. Clarity and Presentation: (4 points)

2i: Presentation

Due: Uploaded Thursday, February 14, 2019.

Prepare a presentation of your process in getting the right design. It should encompass all of your work in Assignment 2.

  • Two members of your team should deliver the presentation, each speaking to relatively equal portions.
  • A seven minute time limit will be strictly enforced, with additional time for questions.

A suggested organization of this presentation is:

  1. Title:

    A short, creative, and marketable title capturing the key idea. Include team member names.

  2. Overall Problem:

    Tell this as a story, instead of simply reading the slide. Motivate your audience to be interested in your problem.

  3. Design Research:

    Include images that give your audience a feeling for your fieldwork. Convey that you have seen and understand the challenge.

  4. 6 Tasks:

    At most one sentence per task. Convey the breadth of tasks you have considered.

  5. 3 Design Sketches:

    Convey the breadth of designs you considered.

  6. Selected Design Storyboards and Tasks:

    Convey your rationale for choosing a design focus.

    Present your storyboards, ensuring they effectively illustrate your selected design and tasks.

  7. Summary:

    Summarize the lessons learned in your design process.

We strongly recommend rehearsing your presentation beforehand. For example, arrange to practice together with another group or two, giving each other feedback on your presentations.

Note that we have not provided recommendations for the number of slides in each section of this presentation. You can deliver your presentation using as many or as few slides as you want, as long as you successfully address the above points and the presentation falls within the time restriction.

Samples from Prior Offerings

Samples from prior offerings include:

Note that details of assignments may have changed since prior offerings, so their reports may not map to the current project. Also note these samples are intended to illustrate a variety of approaches, none of which is intended to be ideal or exemplary. Be sure to understand and carefully consider project requirements and feedback from the course staff in the context of your own work.

Submission

Your presentation may be in PPT, PPTX, or PDF format.

To minimize switching time, we will have all presentations on a single laptop running Microsoft Windows. You should optimize your presentation for portability (e.g., ensure any necessary fonts are embedded). If we detect any obvious formatting issues on the presentation machine, we may fix them or contact you to fix them. But you are ultimately responsible for your presentation.

Submit via Canvas here:

https://canvas.uw.edu/courses/1254716/assignments/4621311

Names of participants should be replaced with pseudonyms in all documents. It is important to protect participant anonymity, even in the case that reporting seems harmless.

Contribution Statement

This requirement was not included in prior offerings. It does not appear in prior samples.

Your submission must also include a team contribution statement, as an additional page in your submission.

This statement should indicate the name of each member of your team, the percentage of effort in this specific assignment that each member contributed, and the specific activities in this specific assignment that each member contributed.

An example contribution statement is:

  • Name 1: 40%, researched the background of the problem, outlined the content of the document, wrote the first version of one paragraph, selected the images to be included
  • Name 2: 15%, conducted 3 interviews and took notes
  • Name 3: 20%, wrote the first version of the background section, made sure the final document was submitted
  • Name 4: 25%, organized the group meeting, conducted 3 interviews (with Name 2), put together the first draft of the document's results section

This contribution statement is intended to support your own reflection as a team as well as the staff's awareness of your efforts. You should therefore discuss and agree upon this statement of what each of you contributed and how much this contributed to the overall assignment. The staff does not expect each person to contribute equally to each assignment, but you should work as a team to support each other, and we expect all members will contribute over the quarter. The staff also understands that percentages are incomplete and subjective, so we gather them only as a summary indication and will not use them directly in any grade calculation.

In-Class Feedback Forms

The course staff will have a feedback form they keep during your presentation:

2i-presentation-staff-form.pdf

Grading

The content of this presentation will be graded on a scale of 10 points:

  • Presentation shows appropriate preparation, with visual aids that are effective, properly prepared, and properly employed.
  • Slides are legible, such that people in the back of the room can still see them.
  • Presentation should not have an outline slide. It is short enough to be told as a story of your process.
  • Problem is presented in a manner that is compelling and achievable.
  • Design research is carried out in an appropriate manner.
  • Design research results are illuminating in terms of the problem.
  • Tasks presented provide coverage of the functionality.
  • Tasks were neither too easy nor too hard.
  • Tasks were motivated by the design research.
  • Design ideas have a strong connection to results of design research.
  • Design ideas are appropriate for the supported tasks.
  • Design ideas and storyboards were at the proper fidelity.
  • Presentation covered the required scope within the allowed time period.

The delivery of this presentation will be graded on a scale of 4 points:

  • Presenter makes eye contact with the audience.
  • Presenter projects their voice well and is audible throughout the room.
  • Presenter feels casual and engaged with the content, not just reading it.
  • Presentation covered the required scope within the allowed time period.

2j: Team Peer Feedback

Due: Submitted end of day Friday, February 15, 2019.

Submit peer feedback using the form distributed to the class by email.

Course staff will request a second round of team peer feedback at the end of the course.