Each project will be graded with respect to four categories. Each category
will receive a score from 0 to 4, based on the following guidelines:
| Category (Down)/ Score (Across) |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
| Design, specification, implementation (style of code),
testing |
Lack of evidence for design, specification, implementation,
and testing of code |
At least one part of the process did not get completed. For
example, there may be no evidence of testing. |
All tasks are done but several of them of them
are not done well. |
All parts of the process are documented, but some part
may lack clear descriptions. For example, the specification for client
code may not be clear |
Project design, specification, code quality, and testing
are well-documented and complete. For example, testing covers most,
if
not
all, cases. |
| Code correctness and adherence to specification |
Project code does not function at all [does not compile] or
addresses few parts of the specification |
Project code addresses less than half the specifications and
works for a limited number of cases |
Project code addresses and functions correctly for about
half the specifications |
Project code addresses and functions correctly for more than
half the specifications, but does not meet all requirements |
Project code meets all requirements in the specification and
functions correctly |
| Written report technical content |
Use of vocabulary is inappropriate, Incomplete descriptions
for many sections of report |
Few technical terms used correctly, some indication that the
student understands the process and design of the application |
Some technical terms used correctly, report is complete but
it is clear the student lacks understanding about the process or code |
Almost all technical terms used correctly, report
demonstrates that student is unclear about a stage in the process or the
code developed |
Report demonstrates that the student understands the full
process, Use of correct technical terms |
| Written report writing style |
Use of incomplete sentences, rough transitions, confusing
descriptions, incorrect grammar |
Much of the report has rough transitions, some incorrect
grammar |
Half of the report is clear and concise with a few rough
sections |
Much of the report is clear and concise, with one or two
rough sections |
Report includes smooth transitions and clear and concise
descriptions |
UW Home 
