This assignment has not yet been released. Its requirements are subject to change.

hw4: Website/App Accessibility Report (Group)

Last revised: Oct 17, 2023

Assigned


Due

Overview

The goal of this homework is to learn how to report your UARs and present them in an actionable form a stakeholder. In Assignment 3, you: learned how to use automated tools (and learned their limitations); and learned how to address the limitations of automated tools using accessibility tools. In this assignment, you will: Learn how to write up an assessment and prioritize what problems to fix; Practice identifying paths to fixing problems. You will also have the opportunity to practice UI image description.

Please note that plain language is not required (or expected) for this assignment.

Competencies

This homework may contribute to your competency grade on

Length & Difficulty

Students in the past have reported that taken together, Assignment 3 and Assignment 4 require a median of 20 hours (mode=6). A challenge that multiple students faced is summarizing the WCAG guidelines in their own words. Please be sure to do so, or to quote and reference WCAG guidelines according to our course policy on academic conduct. Some things that students have told us about this assignment:

Details

For this assignment, you will be given the option to work in a group of up to 4 students who evaluated the same website as you in Assignment 3. However, you are welcome to opt to complete this assignment individually if preferred. There will be time in Section on 10/19 to collaborate with group mates if desired.

For your report please do the following. To help you understand these requirements, here are is an example prior year’s report that is a good example of what you are aiming for (note that small details of requirements may have changed from year to year). Your report should be about 8 pages long, single spaced, with 12 point font. Your report should be accessible (including proper use of headings, ALT text, table markup and so on). If you directly quote anything when describing the issue (for example) include a footnote linking to your source, and put it in quotes.

1. Introduce what you did

Introduce the site or app, its purpose, and the task you assessed and state which accessibility tools, both automated and manual, you and others used in your assessment. It should include an overview table summarizing how you tested the site, that looks something like this.

Task Type (Web/Mobile/etc) Testing Method # UARS found Who Contributed
 

2. Provide an executive summary

Write an executive summary highlighting the biggest (most frequent, severe) problems, and your recommendations for fixing them. Keep this to 1-2 paragraphs.

You should also fill in the following overview table and put it in this section:

WCAG # # Severe problems # Moderate problems Minor problems

3. Provide details on what needs to be done to fix the site or app

The remainder of your report should provide an overview, and detail, on the problems found, grouped by WCAG #. This is a good section of the report to divide and conquer if working in a group.

For each WCAG #:

In addition, for each problem, or set of problems, you should discuss the remedy that is needed to address it. Be as concrete as you are able to be given the information available to you.

4. Make sure your report is accessible

We ask that you do four things to make the deliverable accessible:

Turnin

Turn in your report document. Note: do not submit a PDF. We expect your submission to be a Word or Google Doc. Also turn in (individually) a description of what you contributed to the report. This will impact which competencies we grade you on. It is fine if more than one person works on the same thing, but describe how: For example, if one person made the report accessible, and a second person double checked it, tell us what role you played.