Students are expected to be familiar with all of the information below. Read it fully and carefully.
I have also prepared an introductory video, available here (as "cse331-24su-intro", slides here), which discusses the goals of the course. At the end, I highlight a few of items from below that I want to be sure you don't miss while reading it through. Please find time to watch the video before the first lecture on Monday, June 17th.
The goals of this course are teach students to:
The course assumes knowledge of the Java programming language at the level covered in CSE 123; however, students will not program in Java in this course. Instead, Java mainly will be used as a point of comparison for the language that is used (TypeScript).
We expect to cover (at least) the following topics during the course:
There is no required textbook for the course. However, students may find the articles linked on the Resources page useful to read at some point during the course.
Additionally, many students, early in their CS careers, find the following book helpful (although it will not be referenced much if at all during the course):
The Pragmatic Programmer by Andrew Hunt and David Thomas, 20th anniversary (2nd) edition, Addison-Wesley, 2020.
Lecture will be given in person, at the location and time shown on the time schedule. The lecture will be recorded for the benefit of students who are sick or otherwise unable to attend.
Each week includes a TA-led quiz section. These will not be recorded, but the printed material used will be posted on the Topics page.
Each quiz section will be focused on preparation for the next homework assignment. A substantial portion of the time will be spent on practice problems similar to those appearing in that homework. It is very important that students take the time to work through the practice problems before attempting the homework to make sure they understand how to solve them.
Past experience indicates that section attendance is extremely important for being successful in the course. For that reason, participation in section is expected. Those who are sick or otherwise unable to attend can complete the practice problems on their own and submit their solutions in Gradescope by 11pm on Thursday. (If a student is completely unavailable on the day of a quiz section, they can contact the instructors or their section TA to make special arrangements.)
If students do not attend section, do not submit a solution to the worksheet in Gradescope, and do not make special arrangements to submit later, then the staff will interpret that as a statement that the student is confident they can complete the homework on their own without any help from TAs. In particular, that they do not need one-on-one help in office hours. As a result, TAs will allocate their extremely limited time in office hours to students who do attend section or submit the worksheet on Gradescope. (Of course, students who skip section can still ask questions on the message board.)
Homework assignments will generally be posted late Thursday evening, so that students can start the assignment on Friday. As noted above, Thursdays are intended to be used for working on the section worksheet and asking questions to clarify any issues that were unclear. Official section solutions will be generally released by mid-Friday.
Assignments can require either solutions in the form of written answers, typed code, or both. Generally, the amount of code required will increase as the course progresses.
Past experience tells us that some of the homework assignments in this course can be very time consuming for some students. Students should plan to have at least 8 hours available per week to work on assignments, with the expectation that some assignments could require even more time depending on the student's background.
Students are expected to complete all homework assignments. Students who receive no (or essentially no) credit for multiple assignments risk failing. Outside of those circumstances, however, failing the course is highly unusual.
Occasionally, we will discover errors in an assignment after it is posted (typically, just small typos). We will maintain a log on the website with all changes made to the assignment. If (and only if) we believe there is potential for students to submit correct solutions to the earlier version, we will also email all students about the change. In particular, we will not send email if the earlier version is obviously nonsensical. (Most typos fall into this category.)
The course will have no exams. 🎉
Students can ask questions at any time on the message board. During normal working hours, they should receive a response within a fairly short period of time (almost always under an hour).
Each member of the course staff will have at least one office hour every week, where students can get one-on-one help. See the Weekly Schedule on the Calendar page for office hours times and locations.
Note, however, that office hours are the most limited resource available to students — those held near the due date of assignments are almost always oversubscribed — so asking questions on the message board should always be preferred.
As noted above, office hours will be reserved for students who either attended section or submitted a solution to the section worksheet in Gradescope the prior Thursday. Those who skip section can still ask questions on the message board, but one-on-one help in office hours is reserved for students who worked on the section problems as expected.
All work will be turned in via Gradescope. For each assignment, you will turn in your written work and code separately.
You will turn in your written work to the "HW <name> Written" assignment on Gradescope. Make sure that any handwritten work is legible (and dark enough) for us to read. If the graders cannot read your solution, they cannot give you points. Also, when you turn in your written HW to Gradescope, please match each HW problem to where you did your work. If you do not do this, or your work is hard to read, you may receive a point deduction.
You will turn in your code to the "HW <name> Code" assignment on Gradescope. You only need to submit the final version of each of the files you worked on in the assignment.
In the HW instructions, for each coding problem, we will identify which
files you will need to upload to Gradescope. It is crucial that you only
upload the files that we instruct you to, or else you may not pass the
autograder. For example, if HW Example Problem 30 says to upload file
example.ts and Problem 60 says to upload fun.ts, you
should only upload example.ts and fun.ts to
Gradescope. You should not put example.ts and
fun.ts into a folder, and then upload the folder to Gradescope, as
this will cause you to fail the autograder. The autograder will verify that you
have submitted the correct files, it is your responsibility to check the
autograder output.
Be sure to look for any error messages from the autograder when you submit, and be sure that you received all of the auto-graded points. If you did not, you can examine the error messages, identify the problem, and then re-submit a corrected solution. Make sure you leave enough time to fix any errors that identified by the autograder. Try to avoid submitting for the first time during the last few minutes before the assignment is due because that will not leave you enough time to fix any problems you encounter.
If grading mistakes occur, students are encouraged to bring them to the attention of the course staff and see that they are corrected. They can do so by requesting a regrade in Gradescope, with the following caveats:
We will only entertain regrade requests for one week after the grades are initially are posted. In particular, students searching for extra points late in the quarter by requesting regrades of problems from early assignments will be ignored.
While regrades can (and should) be used to fix mistakes where a correct solution is mistakenly marked incorrect, they cannot (and should not) be used to request changes to amounts of points deducted for errors. Deductions are applied consistently to all students. We will not give one student a smaller deduction than others who made the same (or very similar) mistakes, so do not ask us to do so.
If students wish to fix an inconsistency between the grading of two assignments that had similar answers, both students must request a regrade. That way, the staff can determine whether the appropriate correction is to add points to the student with the lower score or remove them from the student with the higher score. If only the student who lost points requests a regrade, it will be ignored.
For the final assignment, the staff will not regrade individual parts. Students can request a regrade for the entire assignment, and their points may go up or down as a result.
Students should expect and demand to be treated with respect by their classmates and the course staff. All students belong here, and the staff is here to help them learn and enjoy a challenging course. If any incident occurs that challenges this commitment to a supportive and inclusive environment, students should let the staff know so the issue can be addressed. You can use the anonymous feedback tool if you would like to tell us something anonymously.
Homework assignments are designed to be completed by the due dates listed. Situations may arise, however, where students are unable to complete the assignment by those dates. For that reason, the staff will allow students to submit each assignments 24 hours late with no penalty.
Late work not meeting this condition (i.e., more than 24 hours late on one assignment) will only be accepted after a discussion with course instructor. There is no need to talk to the instructor unless more than one late day is needed on an individual assignment. Students do not need to take any special action when submitting an assignment late.
In addition, please note that:
The 24 hour grace period is intended to cover any emergencies that arise. We do not grant extra late days beyond the grace period, just for emergencies — those grace period is intended to cover most emergencies.
Finishing an assignment 24 hours late usually puts the student behind schedule for the next assignment. Avoid the snowball effect!
The day after the assignment is due is intended to be focused on the section component of the next assignment. If a student is unable to fully concentrate on quiz section, then they go into the next assignment at a disadvantage. Hence, it is always to the student's benefit to finish each assignment on time.
Students are allowed to discuss homework problems with others, but they must write or type their solution individually, without assistance.
Student solutions are not group work. Students can work together to solve problems, but then, they must leave the group, taking no written or electronic records of group work with them; wait at least 20 minutes; and then write up / code up their solution on their own, unassisted. Students who initially solve problems with a group, must list the other group members as "collaborators" in the written part of their solution.
This policy clearly precludes copying code off of the Internet. Hence, students should not consult the Internet for problems or key-phrases. This includes Google, Stack Overflow, reddit, and any other website. However, students may consult the internet for ideas, definitions, and understanding general concepts.
Each student should keep anything they plan to submit as a solution completely private. Under no circumstances should they give a copy of their code or written work to another student, as that would clearly violate the rules listed above.
AI tools such as GitHub Copilot or ChatGPT are clearly not allowed under the policy described above. While using Copilot is entirely reasonable on personal projects, it must be turned off when completing the assignments in this course.
Such tools have essentially memorized all the code on the Internet. Asking the tool to produce code from its memory is no different, as far as we are concerned, from searching for the code and then copying it yourself. We explicitly disallow the latter, so the former is also disallowed.
On the other hand, students are allowed to look at outside resources in order to build up their understanding and then use their understanding to solve the problem. It is understanding that will get students a job. (No one will pay someone just to type prompts into ChatGPT. They can do that themselves!) Hence, any technique that short circuits the process of building up understanding is adverse to a student's long-term career goals, and so we disallow it.
As noted above, the staff expects each student to write their own solutions, independently. Attempting to misrepresent another student's solution as their own would be unfair to the other students in the course and constitute academic misconduct in violation of the Allen School policy. Any such violation will be reported to University, and the instructor will make every attempt to ensure the harshest allowable penalty.
Note that, in cases where one student copies the solution of another, both students have violated the policy and both will be disciplined. Again, all students should keep their solutions private.
If a student is ever unclear about whether their discussions with other students went over the line, they should (a) ask and (b) describe their collaboration clearly on their assignment. If they do, the worst that will happen is losing some points. That is much better than the alternative.
Please refer to university policies regarding disability accommodations and religious accommodations.
Students are responsible for making sure that they submit solutions to the final version of the problems posted on the website. (As noted above, the initially posted versions of assignments sometimes contain errors.) Students should confirm that they have solved the final version by consulting the change log on the website before submitting their solutions.
Graders will identify incorrect answers in submitted solutions and deduct points commensurate with the severity of the errors made. They will aim to deduct points consistently across all assignments making the same or similar errors.
In addition, the course has the following policies:
Graders will ignore requests to change the amount of points deducted. These amounts, as long as they are applied consistently, are entirely at the discretion of the course staff.
Graders will ignore legalistic arguments about why incorrect solutions should be accepted under an alternative reading of the problem statement. Incorrect answers will be marked as such as long as the staff believes the intention of the problem statement was clear.
Talking to a staff member does not take away the student's responsibility to submit a correct answer. The staff will not accept incorrect answers due to a claim that some staff member said it was acceptable. Students sometimes misunderstand what TAs are trying to say, and in any case, it remains the students responsibility to make sure their understanding of the problem statements matches up with the plain meaning of the instructions given in the assignment or class.
Overall scores for the course will be determined entirely from Homework grades.
Homework assignments will not be weighted equally because they are of different length and sophistication. Later assignments will generally be weighted more heavily because they are more involved. In particular, we expect the individual assignments to have the following weights in the overall grade:
| 8.0% each | HW from Weeks 1–2 |
| 13.5% each | HW from Weeks 3–7 |
| 16.5% | Final HW |
That said, we may need to adjust the weights if any assignments turn out to be much more difficult or easier than expected.
Overall percentage scores will be translated into course grades as described in the following table:
| 96.5% | 4.0 | 84.0% | 3.4 | 71.5% | 2.8 | ||
| 94.5% | 3.9 | 82.0% | 3.3 | 69.5% | 2.7 | ||
| 92.5% | 3.8 | 80.0% | 3.2 | 67.5% | 2.6 | ||
| 90.5% | 3.7 | 78.0% | 3.1 | 65.0% | 2.5 | ||
| 88.5% | 3.6 | 75.5% | 3.0 | 63.0% | 2.4 | ||
| 86.0% | 3.5 | 73.5% | 2.9 | 61.0% | 2.3 |
Grades for scores below 60% will be determined by the instructor on a case-by-case basis. (In particular, I reserve the right to pass students whose percentages would fall below 2.0 if the above table is continued.)
The median grade is expected to be about 90% on the homework assignments. That would translate into an overall percentage score of 87%, using the tentative weights in the first table above. Per the second table, that translates to a 3.5 grade as it is above 86.0% and below 88.5%.
Start assignments early. Aim to complete them the day before they are due. Assignments are often more difficult than expected, and students should also to leave time to make and correct mistakes.
Prefer the message board to office hours. Office hours get very busy, especially in the last 48 hours before assignments are due. (Yet another reason to start early is so that students can attend office hours that are less busy.) Even just before assignments are due, however, questions on the Message Board are usually answered within a short period of time.
Do not skip class to work on homework, not even late in the quarter when students are more tired and busy. Doing so often seems like it will save time in the short run, but it will cost time in the long run.
Think about which lecture material applies to that homework problem. As described above, each assignment is intended to apply ideas from lecture, so if it does not seem that any lectures apply to a given problem, it is nearly certain that the student did not understand some part of some lecture.
Focus on understanding, not on getting points. A student's understanding of the material, not the points they received, is what will get them a job and ensure a successful career as a programmer.