|
|
|
…The so-called
“Stan Shih smile.” Nowadays, significant value is accrues to companies who
can develop and protect an important, fundamental new technology—companies
like Intel with its process & device technologies and x86 architecture,
Xilinks with their FGPAs or 3M, for example. At the other end of the
spectrum, significant value accrues to companies who can identify and address
important new markets—who build the right thing at the right time and can
create a franchise; “technology as fashion,” for example.
|
|
Of course one still
definitely needs a great team to get the job done, but the most substantial
portion of the ROI can be attributed to owning and protecting critical new
technologies and in understanding and executing against the market and
business issues of the time.
|
|
Now I know most of
you are familiar with the work of Harvard Business School Professor Clayton
Christiensen, well known for his important book “The Innovators Dilemma” and
his concept of a “disruptive technology.” Well, just as a technology can be
disruptive, so can a new business model—a new approach to markets, a new way
of financing or distributing products and services, a new way of integrating
existing markets, and so on. I use the term ‘business model’ in its broadest
possible interpretation.
|
|
In fact, I
believe that the real disruptive opportunities of this time we are in lie
more to the left of this image than to the right—that we should be
spending more time thinking about disruptive business models and the creation
of new categories of products and services, new distribution and support
models, and so on—than the opportunities that lie purely on the right.
|
|
Moreover, if we can
actually include the entire spectrum in our thinking—from technologies to
markets and the methodologies that get us there—we have the chance to really
make a difference. Throughout this presentation, I will argue that in ICT
research and development we should organize ourselves with this goal in mind.
To maximize the potential impact of our work, it is more important than
ever to consider the application of our research to modern products, systems,
and services.
|
|
|