|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- My Background—A Context for my Comments
- “Berkeley’s” Credentials
- PeopleàImpactàReputationàBrand ValueàPeople
- Why is this Topic Increasingly Important Today?
- The Evolving (Critical?) Role of the Modern Research University
- Diffusing Knowledge & Understanding
- An Example: Electronic Design Automation (EDA)
- Transfer what?
- Facilitating Invention & Diffusion
- The Moon Shot Principle—Use-inspired basic research
- The Priests versus the Shamans
- Impeding Collaboration & Diffusion
- Example: Faculty consulting in the UC system today
|
|
3
|
- Grew up in Melbourne, Australia, 1951-1975
- Left because I met UCB Prof. Don Pederson in Melb. and helped him with
SPICE—Open Source
- Ph.D. Student, UC Berkeley, 1975-78
- Continued work on SPICE at UCB
- Observed problems arising from student consulting
- Professor, UC Berkeley, 1979-present
- Worked with Sematech, MCC, Bell Labs, Xerox PARC, Interval Research,
many high-tech co’s.
- Chair, Department of Electrical
Engineering and Computer Sciences, 1999-2000
- Dean of Engineering, 2001-present
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- Venture Partner, The Mayfield Fund, 1988-2002
- Helped found 20+ high technology companies
- Attended partner’s meetings
- Venture Partner, Tallwood Venture Capital, 2002-present
|
|
6
|
- Founding Director, The Gigascale Systems Research Center (www.gigascale.org),
1998-2002
- Established in 1998 to address
the challenges of the growing chip design productivity gap
- Cosponsored by government (DARPA) and industry (SIA)
- One of six MARCO national research centers
- Annual research budget of around $8M
- In 2000 had grown to 24 faculty at 11 universities, 11 postdocs, 56 PhD
students, many industrial fellows
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- My Background—A Context for my Comments
- “Berkeley’s” Credentials
- PeopleàImpactàReputationàBrand ValueàPeople
- Why is this Topic Increasingly Important Today?
- The Evolving (Critical?) Role of the Modern Research University
- Diffusing Knowledge & Understanding
- An Example: Electronic Design Automation (EDA)
- Transfer what?
- Facilitating Invention & Diffusion
- The Moon Shot Principle—Use-inspired basic research
- The Priests versus the Shamans
- Impeding Collaboration & Diffusion
- Example: Faculty consulting in the UC system today
|
|
9
|
- Pre-stressed Concrete
- Ground Fault Interrupter
- Berkeley Unix
- Relational Database Technology (following IBM)
- Electronic Design Automation: SPICE to Synopsys
- RISC (with Stanford), RAID
- CyberCut online manufacturing systems
- NOW (Networks of Workstations)
- Salmon with antifreeze (grapes next?)
- IEEE Floating Point
- Infopad (now called WebPad, TabletPC,…)
- Semiconductor Devices & Modeling
- MEMS, Smart Dust, …
- Berkeley faculty are fundamentally motivated by high-potential-impact,
long-range research
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- My Background—A Context for my Comments
- “Berkeley’s” Credentials
- PeopleàImpactàReputationàBrand ValueàPeople
- Why is this Topic Increasingly Important Today?
- The Evolving (Critical?) Role of the Modern Research University
- Diffusing Knowledge & Understanding
- An Example: Electronic Design Automation (EDA)
- Transfer what?
- Facilitating Invention & Diffusion
- The Moon Shot Principle—Use-inspired basic research
- The Priests versus the Shamans
- Impeding Collaboration & Diffusion
- Example: Faculty consulting in the UC system today
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- We must all take a truly global view
- Berkeley/Bay Area has a unique and differentiated role to play
- Major research universities are becoming the “DMZ” of research
- It’s all about leverage
- Tackle projects of a scale otherwise not possible by a single company
- Build informal connections to other companies—established and start-up
- Opportunity to really be in touch with latest developments, at the
University but also in the start-up environment—globally
- Most important aspect is extracting maximum, bilateral value through
synergy
- Requires focused, sustained investment on both sides
- Tech transfer in IT happens via people
- True collaboration requires ability to influence research agenda
through dialog
|
|
14
|
- Major corporate research laboratories of significance have mostly faded
away (a few exceptions!), so who is going to do the work?
- Consortia take too long to assemble and often have very high
infrastructure investment costs
- Universities can be seen as the “choice of last resort”
- Universities are attractive to very smart people from around the
world—at all ages
- Universities usually have a broad range of human capital representing
many different disciplines
- If they do it right, universities can form the neutral, research
commons—the “DMZ of Research”
- Ideally, a global network of universities, inspired by a common set of
grand-challenge “uses” (e.g. energy, education, communicable diseases),
could “hold” the global community needed to address such Great Works of
the 21st Century—but that’s another talk!
|
|
15
|
- (1) People
- (2) Markets
- (3) Products
|
|
16
|
- (1) People
- (2) Innovation (Science & Engineering)
- (3) Relevant Application Context
|
|
17
|
- Almost all projects involve multiple sponsors (federal, state, and
corporate) and overlapping research agendas
- In all cases, the specific research artifacts developed during the
projects could have been circumvented relatively easily
- In all cases, many millions of dollars have flowed to the campus during
and since the projects in support of faculty in their research—a
tradition of support
- Conversely, in almost all software & embedded systems cases where
technology was protected and licensed, the financial return has not been
high and the full potential of the research has been (arguably)
compromised
|
|
18
|
- Berkeley Engineering faculty are primarily motivated by the IMPACT of
their work
- In ICT, impact is usually maximized by making the work widely
available—ACE
- In other disciplines (e.g. Biological sciences), impact may be
maximized by exclusive licensing for royalties—ADC
- Corporate sponsors that collaborate with Berkeley are primarily
concerned about ACCESS to research results
- In certain areas, access is actually maximized by making work open and
available
- Access clearly includes consideration of background rights and shared
rights
|
|
19
|
- My Background—A Context for my Comments
- “Berkeley’s” Credentials
- PeopleàImpactàReputationàBrand ValueàPeople
- Why is this Topic Increasingly Important Today?
- The Evolving (Critical?) Role of the Modern Research University
- Diffusing Knowledge & Understanding
- An Example: Electronic Design Automation (EDA)
- Transferring What?
- Facilitating Invention & Diffusion
- The Moon Shot Principle—Use-inspired basic research
- The Priests versus the Shamans
- Impeding Collaboration & Diffusion
- Example: Faculty consulting in the UC system today
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
- There is an important difference between Artifacts of Collaborative
Evolution (ACE) and Artifacts of Discrete Contribution (ADC)
- Each may be made by an individual or a group
- Each may be comprised of, or influenced by, one or more of the other
- Both kinds of artifacts are extremely important, but must be managed entirely
differently to maximize impact
- (Ed, was that “SUN” or “BUN”?)
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
- We cannot “solve” today’s design productivity crisis
- We must change the problem to one we can solve, and where we can
demonstrate efficient solutions!
- We have done this before, but it requires a comprehensive approach to
the problem and a long-term investment
- It is a methodology change, not just a technology change
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
- All you need to know is in a paper or a patent or a piece of code
- The key ideas can usually be exploited quickly via investment
- The key ideas can be protected and defended efficiently and effectively
- Usually what people have in mind when they speak of “technology” in the
sense of “technology transfer”
- Nowhere near as common as ACE in terms of contribution and large-scale
impact
- What University Technology Licensing offices usually imagine life to be
like
|
|
30
|
- Impact is maximized through a community of smart people adding
increments of value (technology, understanding, explanation)
- The “right answer” usually evolves over a long period of time
- Usually a lot of disagreement (people “not getting it”) in the early
phases, and a “seems really obvious” attitude after success
- Usually a low protection barrier before the community is built
- To “get it” early you need to be immersed in the community
- Often preserved and taken to scale as a “standard”—formal or informal
- Often involves a number of protectable/defensible Artifacts of Discrete
Contribution
- Examples: The Internet & Web, Berkeley UNIX, Window-based UI, TiVO,
TinyOS,
|
|
31
|
- My Background—A Context for my Comments
- “Berkeley’s” Credentials
- PeopleàImpactàReputationàBrand ValueàPeople
- Why is this Topic Increasingly Important Today?
- The Evolving (Critical?) Role of the Modern Research University
- Diffusing Knowledge & Understanding
- An Example: Electronic Design Automation (EDA)
- Facilitating Invention & Diffusion
- Impeding Collaboration & Diffusion
- Example: Faculty consulting in the UC system today
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
- First Two Focus Centers:
- Quality of their Long Range Vision
- Number of ‘Out-of-the-box’ Thinkers on the Team
- Authority & Independence of Center Director
- Nurturing Environment for New Concepts and Radical Alternatives
- Focus Center Member Companies
- Buy-in to the Long Range Vision
- Patient Expectations for Research Results
- Exploitation of Anticipated Results
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
- Technology Management--Create the Shared Vision and Manage the Project
- Technology Diffusion--Member Companies Buy Into the Shared Vision and
Exploit the New Concepts
- Process Assessment--Evaluate the Focus Center Concept & Execution
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
- Protein kinase C activator
- Isolated from the stems of the small Samoan tree Homalanthus nutans
|
|
51
|
- “Patents are expected to be rare, but…”
- If and where IP protection is
indicated and desired:
- Ownership follows inventorship
- Except when obligations are imposed by State tax-free bond funding of
facilities or by 3rd party agreements, existing and new.
- Licensing: CITRIS corporate participants will all gain non-exclusive,
world-wide, royalty-free, access to all IP generated within CITRIS, as
will any other company
- Exclusive, royalty/fee-bearing license an option
- In effect, we are defining an “Openness
Agreement” rather than an “Ownership
Agreement”
|
|
52
|
- My Background—A Context for my Comments
- “Berkeley’s” Credentials
- PeopleàImpactàReputationàBrand ValueàPeople
- Why is this Topic Increasingly Important Today?
- The Evolving (Critical?) Role of the Modern Research University
- Diffusing Knowledge & Understanding
- An Example: Electronic Design Automation (EDA)
- Facilitating Invention & Diffusion
- Impeding Collaboration & Diffusion
- Example: Faculty consulting in the UC system today
|
|
53
|
- Advantages:
- Engineering is a discipline of practice
- Technology diffusion in ICT is via people
- Essential for Visibility/Resources/Impact for College and for the
University
- Challenges:
- Lost time of key faculty for instruction, research and administration
- Possible conflicts of interest:
- Bias in student research
- Bias in student placement
|
|
54
|
- Employees must disclose all inventions
- “The University must be able to meet its obligations assumed under
legally binding contractual obligations with regard to intellectual
property rights generated by faculty and other researchers as a result
of sponsored research agreements, material transfer agreements, and
other research support agreements entered into on behalf of those
faculty and research staff.
Therefore, all inventions made by a University employee must be
disclosed to the University, including inventions made on weekends, on
leave, at home “in the garage,” or during paid or unpaid consulting work. Disclosure is a legal obligation of
employment at the University.”
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
- Issue of Trust
- Butterfly in China
- Incubators in the IT world
- Corporate schizophrenia & IP
- Sematech vs MCC vs SRC vs MARCO
|