------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reviewer name:

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paper title:

------------------------------------------------------------------------


1) Briefly describe the paper and its contribution to computer  
vision,. Please give your assessmentof the scope and magnitude of the  
paper's contribution.
<BriefDescription>
</BriefDescription>


2) Is the exposition clear?  How could it be improved?
<ExpositionClear>
</ExpositionClear>


3) Are the references adequate?  List any references that are needed.
<AdequateReferences>
</AdequateReferences>


4) Could the work be reproduced by one or more skilled graduate
students?  Are all important algorithmic or system details discussed
adequately?  Are the limitations and drawbacks of the work clear?
<Reproducibility>
</Reproducibility>


5) Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the submission.  Include  
suggestions for improvement and publication alternatives, if  
appropriate. Be thorough -- your explanation will be of highest  
importance for any committee discussion of the paper and will be used  
by the authors to improve their work. Be fair -- the authors
spent a lot of effort to prepare their submission, and your evaluation
will be forwarded to them during the rebuttal period.
<ExplainYourRating>
</ExplainYourRating>