Symbolic LAO* with ADD's

From: Danny Wyatt (danny_at_cs.washington.edu)
Date: Wed Nov 19 2003 - 09:54:30 PST

  • Next message: Bhushan Mandhani: "Symbolic LAO* review"

    Symbolic Heuristic Search for Factored Markov Decision Processes
    Zhengzhu Feng, Eric A. Hansen

    Summary
    The authors describe a modification of the LAO* algorithm that searches
    through sets of states in an MDP instead of single states. The sets of
    states---as well as every other part of the MDP---are represented with
    ADD's.

    Important Ideas
    Representing a set of states with a boolean function over the state
    variables allows a set of states to in turn be represented with an ADD
    (or BDD). If the value function over states is also represented as an
    ADD, then irrelevant states can be "masked" out of the value function
    using existing ADD operations between the value ADD and the ADD for a
    set of states.

    Flaws
    The authors say that the search space is so large that they had to use
    their ADD representations for non-symbolic LAO* and SPUDD for some
    tests, but they never specify which. I'd like to see a more
    fine-grained decomposition of the comparisons to better show any
    separate effects of their ADD representations and their symbolic LAO*
    algorithm.

    Open Questions
    Just what is a realistic MDP problem? The authors are unsatisfied with
    how much better their representations performed than SPUDD on the
    factory problems, so they devise new ones to tax their representations
    and algorithm more. But which of these (if either) is more likely in
    applied situations? Or are there several classes of problems each
    admitting their own best algorithm?


  • Next message: Bhushan Mandhani: "Symbolic LAO* review"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Nov 19 2003 - 09:53:53 PST