Review on Paper 3

From: Masaharu Kobashi (mkbsh_at_cs.washington.edu)
Date: Tue Nov 04 2003 - 22:58:42 PST

  • Next message: Patrick Haluptzok: "CSE 573 Paper Review #3 - Reviewed by Patrick Haluptzok Nov 4, 2003"

    Title: Automatic SAT-Compilation of Planning Problems
    Authors: Michael D. Ernst, Todd D. Millstein, Daniel Weld

    [Summary]
    This paper reports the successful creation of an innovative
    compiler to convert planning problems into propositional
    satisfiability problems.

    [Most important ideas]
    Needless to say, the value of this paper comes from the
    creation of, presumably the first, compiler which can
    automatically convert the planning problems to SAT problems
    with remarkable efficiency.

    Second, their compiler is feature rich with the capability
    of generating as many as eight encodings, and they incorporated
    many nice ideas into the compiler such as type optimizations,
    partial action execution etc.

    Finally, they made the code of the compiler open and
    available for inspection and testing to the public.
    That is a very important point and should not be
    underestimated. It is worth more than thousands of words.

    [Shortcomings of the paper]
    First, its effect on the qualitative behavior of planning
    is not covered.
    Second, the significance of the conversion of the
    planning problem to SAT-problem in the planning world
    has not been addressed.
    Third, if I am not misunderstanding the context of the paper,
    some actions taken by the designer of the compiler may
    have problematic effect on the behavior of the resulting
    planning. For example, the factoring of exclusion axioms
    by removing all possibilities of simultaneous actions, etc.
    (It may be due to my lack of understanding the paper.)

    [Two important open research questions]
    First, there may be better encoding than those investigated
    in this paper.
    Second, research on the automatic generation of domain-specific
    axioms, as mentioned in the paper, is an important open question.


  • Next message: Patrick Haluptzok: "CSE 573 Paper Review #3 - Reviewed by Patrick Haluptzok Nov 4, 2003"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Tue Nov 04 2003 - 22:58:42 PST