Review of MACAW

From: T Scott Saponas (ssaponas@u.washington.edu)
Date: Mon Nov 22 2004 - 07:48:20 PST

  • Next message: Kate Everitt: "MACAW"

    Review by T. Scott Saponas

    “MACAW: A Media Access Protocol for Wireless LAN’s” examines the
    performance of wireless LAN media access protocols and proposes a new
    protocol. The main contribution of this paper is developing a new
    wireless media access control protocol that fixes “hidden terminal” and
    “exposed terminal” issues with carrier sense protocols and binary
    exponential backoff’s unfair bandwidth allocation. This new protocol,
    MACAW, solves the “hidden terminal” and “exposed terminal” problems in
    carrier sense by using the idea of request-to-send (RTS) and
    clear-to-send packets (CTS) packets from the MACA protocol. MACAW,
    improves on the bandwidth allocation of MACAW by having all stations use
    the backoff counters seen in packets currently in the air. This makes
    it so everyone has the same backoff counter. They also fix some
    contention problems by introducing a request-for-request-to-send packet
    (RRTS) to allow for receiver to contend on behalf of a receiver that got
    shut out in the last interval. Additionally, MACAW also adds the idea
    of an ACK packet local to the wireless transmission. This is so that
    packet collisions and corruptions in the wireless LAN can be detected
    faster than a multiple of an RTT to the final destination.

    One of the issues I had with the fair allocation mechanism was that it
    is based on the receiver allocating per stream instead of per host.
    They explain the need for this by describing how in most environments
    there will be a base station providing access to everyone and you want
    it to get much of the allocation of bandwidth since it is providing
    service to so many hosts. However, I would argue you could do this
    better by doing allocation per stream (like they are doing) only have
    machines recognize all flows from stations besides the base station as
    one flow and base station flows as multiple flows. This way one
    non-base-station sender cannot hog the network by having a lot of
    sending flows.

    I think this paper’s contribution is quite relevant and useful. While I
    wish the evaluation of their protocol involved more advanced simulation
    and some results from an actual deployment, it appears promising.
    Currently the Internet is edge limited. This is especially true where
    the edge of the network is a wireless LAN. MACAW’s contribution is thus
    quite relevant and import to today’s Internet and networks.


  • Next message: Kate Everitt: "MACAW"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Mon Nov 22 2004 - 07:48:27 PST