MACAW

From: Masaharu Kobashi (mkbsh@cs.washington.edu)
Date: Mon Nov 22 2004 - 00:29:44 PST

  • Next message: Rosalia Tungaraza: "Review #15: MACAW: a media acess protocol for wireless LAN's"

    1. Main result of the paper

       The paper presents a new media access protocol for wireless LANs, MACAW,
       which was derived from MACA and accomplishes remarkable improvements over
       MACA in fairness of bandwidth allocation without degrading the overall
       network utilization significantly.

    2. Strengths in this paper

       The fundamental insight of the new protocol is the recognition of the
    fact
       that the relevant congestion is at the receiver. Upon this basic
    framework
       the new algorithm with added ACK, DS and RRTS was built. As the
    results of
       the simulations show, it really works and improves the fairness
    remarkably.

       Another strength of the algorithm is that it uses separate backoff
       parameters for each stream and for each end of the stream based on the
       insight that the level of congestion varies according to the location
       of receiver.
       
    3. Limitations and suggested improvements

       The setup for the argument misses an important realistic element,
       which is the problems that occur in the state of transition of
       stations (pads). The paper assumes everything is stationary. But at least
       pads can move around freely in the real situations even while they are
       transmitting data. This possibility makes the argument more complex than
       the ones presented in the paper, since the state of congestion and the
       area of exposure to each station can change at any point of transmission.
       Once this factor is taken into account the proposed protocol can have
       difficulties in achieving the reported results.

       The performance evaluation is mostly done with UDP, except one which is
       TCP (Table 11). The effect of transport protocol on the network
    utilization
       is not discussed at all in the paper. It deserves attention since UDP
       and TCP can have different sensitivity to congestion and interruptions
       of transmission.

    4. Relevance today and future
       
       Wireless is the trend of current and future. By now, however,
       the proposed protocol may be already obsolete due to the limitations
       stated by the authors (i.e lack of multicast support etc.) as well as
       the limitations pointed in the above section. But the basic insights
       such as "congestion is at the receiver" are still valid into the future,
       hence the paper will contribute to the design of the future protocols.


  • Next message: Rosalia Tungaraza: "Review #15: MACAW: a media acess protocol for wireless LAN's"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Mon Nov 22 2004 - 00:29:44 PST