review

From: Ioannis Giotis (giotis@cs.washington.edu)
Date: Tue Nov 09 2004 - 17:13:44 PST

  • Next message: Scott Schremmer: "Multicast. ."

    Multicast has drawn a serious attention in the past few years and
    various techniques have been proposed mainly to optimize the large
    bandwidth requirements needed for a “naďve” multicast. In this paper,
    the authors focus on multimedia multicasting. Multimedia content allows
    the use of layered encoding protocols which encode the stream into
    various layers, a subset of which is decoded at the receiver to obtain
    variable quality. The goal is to match the receiver’s bandwidth capacity
    while minimizing the load on the server.

     

    The main idea is that the server sends out all the stream layers but
    does not initiate a direct connection to all the receivers which could
    lead to scaling issues. The receivers are responsible for choosing their
    appropriate level of quality/bitrate they can obtain without congestion
    occurring. The mechanism behind the receivers’ choices is an
    experimentation driven technique where each receiver determines the
    maximum possible subset of layers it can obtain by periodically sampling
    the network’s condition.

     

    The authors propose a scheme that has a lot of benefits, and devote a
    significant part of the paper to deal with all the small details that
    would otherwise render their scheme inefficient such as the interference
    between multiple experiments by different nodes. Their explanations and
    justifications for their decisions are intuitive and simple. They also
    address issues that could arise in the overall multicasting mechanism
    and demonstrate their good understanding of the problem as a whole.

     

    However, the simulated data to support their claims is lacking and
    probably not enough to convince someone that it would be worth
    implementing. And despites their explicitly stated efforts to make their
    design easily deployable it still requires a significant effort. That
    was probably the reason why a similar scheme is not used in practice
    today, although multi-bitrate multicasting is used somewhat.

     

    Still, their results remain relevant today and the need to address the
    issue will be perhaps more critical in the near future as the demand for
    multimedia multicasting increases.

     

     




  • Next message: Scott Schremmer: "Multicast. ."

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Tue Nov 09 2004 - 17:13:44 PST