The PIM Architecture for Wide-Area Multicast Routing

From: Masaharu Kobashi (mkbsh@cs.washington.edu)
Date: Wed Nov 10 2004 - 00:05:11 PST

  • Next message: Seth Cooper: "Review of "The PIM Architecture for Wide-Area Multicast Routing""

    1. Main result of the paper

       The paper proposes PIM, a wide-area multicast mechanism, that overcomes
       shortcomings of previous multicast architectures and provides
    scalability,
       unicast protocol independence and great adaptability to underlying
       network conditions.
       
    2. Strengths in this paper

       One of the greatest properties of PIM is the unicast protocol
    independence.
       Because of this property, it can be deployed without requiring changes to
       the fundamental behavior of routers, hence easily deployable now and
       adaptable to unexpected environmental changes in the future.

       Another key element is it can reduce the total state in routers to be
       on the order of the number of groups rather than the number of senders
       times the number of groups.

       It is also flexible enough to be able to switch from the shared-tree to
       SPT when it is necessary to facilitate more efficient routing.

    3. Limitations and suggested improvements

       Fault-tolerant mechanism in shared-tree is not incorporated or at least
       is not explained in the paper. Once a RP router is disabled, it seems
       there is no way for another RP substitutes it. It is a critical point
       and has to be incorporated in the architecture.

       Decision on the threshold for switching from shared-tree to SPT (source-
       specific shortest-path-tree) is hard to make in terms of both the
       amount of traffic and the duration of high load. The paper does not
    explain
       well about this critical point.

       There is no mechanism, or at least it is not explained in the paper,
       to switch back to shared-tree from SPT. Without this mechanism, there
       is possibility that with sporadic bursts from many sources the whole
       tree becomes virtually SPT and it loses the merit of saving states.

    4. Relevance today and future

       The design seems to have great value in the current as well as future
       Internet to facilitate multicast in an efficient way. Its "unicast
       protocol independence" makes it possible to deployable even in the
       changing future environment.


  • Next message: Seth Cooper: "Review of "The PIM Architecture for Wide-Area Multicast Routing""

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Nov 10 2004 - 00:05:11 PST