Review of "An Analysis of Internet Content Delivery Systems"

From: Jonas Lindberg (jonaslin@kth.se)
Date: Wed Nov 03 2004 - 08:39:55 PST

  • Next message: Ioannis Giotis: "review"

    Review of S. Saroiu, K. P. Gummadi, R. J. Dunn, S. D. Gribble, and H. M.
    Levy's "An Analysis of Internet Content Delivery Systems"

     

    By: Jonas Lindberg

     

    In this paper the authors analyze inbound and outbound Internet traffic in
    the University of Washington WAN for four different content delivery
    systems: HTTP web, Akamai, Gnutella and Kazaa. Some results are interesting
    and some fairly surprising. One of more interesting observations is how the
    peer-to-peer traffic does not scale very well. The analysis shows that a
    small number of Kazaa peers are responsible for a large amount of the total
    Kazaa traffic, which is also substantial part of the total Internet traffic.

     

    Another interesting part of the paper is where the authors suggest and
    experiment with a cache for peer-to-peer applications. The experiments show
    that using a P2P cache can result in a significant decreased in bandwidth
    usage. It is certainly an interesting idea, but I wonder if this would be
    possible to implement for a university, since it is essentially supporting
    activities that in some cases violate copyrights.

     

    The authors ambition in this paper seem to be to examine the general use of
    content delivery systems in the Internet, and, weather or not this be the
    case, it would have been interesting if they had commented on if the
    collected data is representative for the rest of the Internet.

     

    I think the paper has some interesting points, and the results presented are
    well explained and illustrated in a good way. However, the paper still feels
    a little thin and I do not think I have learned as much from it as from the
    other papers we have read in this course.

     


  • Next message: Ioannis Giotis: "review"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Nov 03 2004 - 17:40:29 PST