Explicit Allocation of Best-Effort Packet Delivery Service

From: Masaharu Kobashi (mkbsh@cs.washington.edu)
Date: Tue Oct 26 2004 - 08:59:36 PDT

  • Next message: Kate Everitt: "Explicit Allocation of Best-Effort Packet Delivery Service"

    1. Main result of the paper

       The paper presents an allocated-capacity framework that provides
    different
       levels of best-effort service in times of network congestion based on two
       types of bandwidth control: sender-based and receiver based.
       It claims that the new framework can achieve different throughput with
       high assurance, although the claim is based on simulations with simple
       setups.

    2. Strengths in this paper

       The proposed framework requires most of the complexity necessary for the
       implementation to the edge of network. It has a great advantage, since
       it makes it scalable and flexible.

       If this is widely deployed, it has a possibility that it can be a
       rational basis for cost allocation which enables the Internet to fund
       for future growth.

    3. Limitations and suggested improvements

       Although the paper claims it is "predictable" by simple simulations,
       it seems for the general users on the real Internet it is quite doubtful
       that the framework can provide highly predictable results.

       Another weakness is it still depends on the changes to the behavior
       of routers consistently. So it will require concerted effort throughout
       the Internet, which can be hard to achieve in reality.

       It is also vulnerable to malicious hosts and routers which changes
       the header info to their advantage.

       Finally, but most important, there is a big question on how much demand
       there is for the proposed discriminating services from the Internet
    users.
       Without demand the scheme is useless. If "the first class" and "the
    economy
       class" are provided, it will be hard to price them and more
    problematic is
       the fact that the value of the first class will decline as the amount of
       the use of the first class increases. Eventually, it can happen that
       everyone needs to subscribe the first class just to get acceptable speed
       in almost any services because of dominant weight of the first class
       on the Internet.
       
    4. Relevance today and future

       I do not think it is realistic for the above reasons that the proposed
       system will be a good solution to the Internet's congestion problems or
       to satisfying different types of demands from users. The greatest problem
       is the difficulty of pricing and the diminishing value of the first class
       as the first class is
    oversold.


  • Next message: Kate Everitt: "Explicit Allocation of Best-Effort Packet Delivery Service"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Tue Oct 26 2004 - 08:59:36 PDT