CSE/NB 528 Homework 2: Neuron Models

(Due Date: Sunday May 8, 2011 before midnight)

 

Submission Procedure:
Create a Zip file called "528-hw2-lastname-firstname" containing the following:
(1) Document containing your answers to any questions asked in each exercise, 
     as well as any figures, plots, or graphs supporting your answers,
(2) Your Matlab program files,
(3) Any other supporting material needed to understand/run your solutions in Matlab.
 
Upload your Zip file to this dropbox.
 
Upload your file by 11:59pm Sunday, May 8, 2011. 
Late submission policy is here.
 

 

The first three exercises will take you from modeling simple passive membranes and integrate-
and-fire neurons to modeling synapses. These exercises will provide you with a basic set of 
"starter code" you could use for investigating potential research questions such as 
temporal versus rate-based coding and synaptic plasticity. 
 
The extra-credit problem tests your understanding of information theory and neural coding. 
(Note: You won’t be penalized if you skip extra-credit problems; extra-credit points will be added 
after finals scores have been computed).
 
 
1.     (Fun with membranes; 30 points) Download and run the following Matlab code for 
       modeling a passive neuronal membrane as an RC-circuit: membrane.m
This code demonstrates how a membrane responds to a constant current input that is 
turned on for a fixed time interval and then turned off.
a.  Change the values for the membrane's resistance and capacitance (R and C), 
and find out how this influences the response of the membrane. Does it reach a 
stable value more quickly or more slowly after:
          i.  multiplying R by 5
                        ii. dividing C by 10
                        iii. multiplying R by 10 AND dividing C by 10?
b.     An experimental method for calculating a membrane’s time constant tau (when R 
and/or C are not known) is to start at zero and record the time at which the membrane 
potential V reaches a value approximately equal to 0.6321*V_peak= 0.6321*(I*R), where 
I is the constant injected current. Check if this method works by injecting different 
amounts of current I and changing the values for R and C. Once you’ve convinced 
yourself that the experimental tau appears to be identical to the theoretical tau (= RC) in all 
these cases, provide a theoretical justification for why this method works. (Hint: Derive a 
closed form exponential equation for V(t) by solving the differential equation for V and 
find the value of V at time t = tau).
 
2.     (Get fired up about Integrate-and-Fire neurons; 35 points) Run the following Matlab 
       code for modeling an integrate-and-fire neuron: intfire.m
a.     Vary the input current gradually from very low to high values and find out the
          minimum current needed to cause the neuron to spike.
b.     What is the maximum firing rate (spike count/trial duration) of this neuron and 
          how is it related to the absolute refractory period “abs_ref” in the code? 
c.      Plot a graph showing input current versus the output firing rate of the neuron.
d.     Instead of feeding constant input, make the current I a sinusoidal function of 
          time: I = sin((1:tstop)*f); where f is the input frequency. Plot a graph showing 
          the output firing rate as a function of input frequency.
e.      Find the “resonant frequency” (if any) where the neuron “tracks” the input by 
          firing exactly 1 spike for each peak in the input.
 
3.     (Get to know an Alpha Synapse; 35 points) Here's some code for simulating an 
       integrate-and-fire neuron receiving input spikes through an alpha synapse: 
       alpha_neuron.m 
The parameter “t_peak” controls when the alpha function peaks after an input spike 
occurs (and hence how long the effects of an input spike linger on in the postsynaptic 
neuron). “t_peak” for excitatory synapses in the brain may vary from 0.5 ms (AMPA 
or non-NMDA) to 40 ms (NMDA synapse). 
a.     Vary the value of t_peak from 0.5 ms to 10 ms in steps of 0.5 ms and observe 
          how this influences the output of the neuron for the fixed input spike train used 
          in this code. Plot the output spike count as a function of t_peak for the given 
          input spike train.
b.     Fix t_peak = 0.5 ms. Change the input firing rate by varying the threshold 
          parameterthr” from 0.7 to 0.95 in steps of 0.05. For each value of “thr”, 
          repeat the experiment 5 times with different random input spike trains. Record 
          both the output and the input firing rates in each case. Plot the average output 
          firing rate as a function of average input firing rate at each value of “thr”. Is the 
          shape of this input-versus-output plot similar to or different from the plot in 
          2c?
c.      How would you turn this synapse into an inhibitory synapse? Make the 
          necessary change to the code such that the random input spike train in 3a 
          (stored in “spike_train”) now acts through an inhibitory synapse.  Add a 
          constant current input to the neuron that is sufficient to cause it to spike with a
          high firing rate of about 150 Hz in the absence of inhibitory inputs. Now turn 
          on the inhibitory input spike train and vary the value of t_peak from 1 ms to 15 
          ms in steps of 2 ms (with g_peak = 0.05 as in 3a). Plot the output spike count 
          as a function of t_peak for the given input spike train.
 
 

Extra Credit Problem (Information Theory and Neural Coding; 20 points)

         Show that the firing-rate distribution that maximizes

     the entropy when the firing rate is constrained to lie in the range 0 <= r <=  rmax is given by

     equation 4.22 in the textbook, and that its entropy is given by equation 4.23. Use a Lagrange

     multiplier (see the Mathematical Appendix in the textbook) to constrain the integral of p[r]

     to one.