CSE512 Data Visualization (Spring 2022)

<< Back to home

Assignment 2: Deceptive Visualization

As visualizations increasingly play a role in how the general public consumes news and information, it is important to realize how a visualization design may influence what a viewer concludes and remembers about the data. In this assignment, you will identify a dataset of interest and design two static visualizations to communicate the data. One design will be an earnest representation of the data, whereas the other will be a deceptive visualization that aims to mislead the viewer. For this second image, the design challenge is to mislead without using obvious distortions or omissions.

Assignment

Your task is to design two static (single image) visualizations of your chosen dataset. One visualization should aim to effectively and earnestly communicate insights about the data, whereas the other visualization design should aim to mislead the viewer into drawing the wrong conclusions. You will also provide a short write-up (no more than 4 paragraphs) describing your design rationale for both visualizations.

For this assignment, we will consider an earnest visualization to be one where:

  • The visualization is clear and interpretable by the general population
  • The visual encodings are appropriate and effective for the intended task
  • Data transformations are clearly and transparently communicated
  • The underlying data source (and any potential bias) is clearly communicated

On the other hand, a deceptive visualization may exhibit the following properties:

  • The visual representation is intentionally inappropriate or misleading
  • Titles are skewed to intentionally influence the viewer's perception
  • The data has been transformed or filtered in an intentionally misleading way
  • The existence or source of bias in the underlying data is unclear

For the earnest visualization, your goal is to be as clear and transparent as possible to help viewers answer your intended question. For the deceptive visualization, your goal is to trick the viewer (including the course staff!) into believing that the visualization is legitimate and earnest. It should not be immediately obvious which visualization is trying to be deceptive. Subtle ineffective choices in the design should require close and careful reading to be identified.

For both visualization designs, start by choosing a question you would like to answer. Design your visualization to answer that question either correctly (for the earnest visualization) or incorrectly (for the deceptive visualization). You may choose to address a different question with each visualization. Be sure to document the question as part of the visualization design (e.g., title, subtitle, or caption) and in your assignment write-up.

Your write-up should contain the following information:

  • Your name and UW netid
  • The specific question each visualization aims to answer
  • A description of your design rationale and important considerations for each visualization

Recommended Data Sources

To get up and running quickly with this assignment, we recommend using one of the following provided datasets or sources, but you are free to use any dataset of your choice. You must use the same dataset for both visualizations, but you may transform the data differently or choose to address a different question for each design. These datasets are intentionally chosen to cover politically charged topics for the simple reason that these are typically the types of data where deceptive visualizations may proliferate.


The World Bank Data, 1960-2018

The World Bank has tracked global human development by indicators such as climate change, economy, education, environment, gender equality, health, and science and technology since 1960. You can browse the data by indicators or by countries. Click on an indicator category or country to download the CSV file.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions, 1990-2019

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has compiled data for the emissions of all participating countries broken out by the pollutant (e.g., carbon monoxide, methane, etc.) and by different sources (e.g., energy, agriculture, etc.). While the linked interface can be somewhat hard to navigate, you are free to browse alternate themes from the panel on the left (such as education or health). You can download the data by selecting "Export" at the top of the chosen table.

Data: Greenhouse Gas Emissions

DEA Pain Pills Database

The Washington Post has published a significant portion of a database maintained by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) that tracks every opioid from their manufacturer, through to distributors, and into pharmacies in towns and cities across the United States. Note that this is a very large dataset with many different facets, so you may want to focus on a particular area or set of attributes of interest.

Important Note: In order to download and use this data you may need to enter your email in order to access the Washington Post Data Access page.

Data: Washington Post Data Access Page

Here are some other possible sources to consider. You are also free to use data from a source different from those included here. If you have any questions on whether a dataset is appropriate, please ask the course staff ASAP!

Grading

The assignment score is out of a maximum of 15 points. We will determine scores by judging the soundness of your visualization designs, the duplicity of your deceptive visualization, and the quality of the write-up. Here are examples of aspects that may lead to point deductions:

  • Obvious identification of the earnest and deceptive visualizations.
  • Ineffective visual encodings for your stated goal.
  • Missing indication of the main analysis question.
  • Missing or incomplete design rationale in write-up.

We will reward entries that go above and beyond the assignment requirements to produce effective (and deceptive) graphics. Examples may include outstanding visual design, effective annotations and other narrative devices, exceptional creativity, or deceptive designs that require the write-up in order to properly identify the misleading design components.

Submission Details

This is an individual assignment. You may not work in groups.

Your completed visualization images and write-up are due Friday 4/22, 11:59pm PT on gradescope. Submissions will be reviewed as part of a subsequent peer review assignment (due: Friday 4/29), so try to avoid a late submission; assignments submitted late may not be included as part of the peer review and thus not receive peer feedback.

You must submit your assignment using gradescope. Please upload two image files (PNG or JPG) of your visualization design, named using the pattern "a2_earnest.png" (for your earnest chart) and "a2_deceptive.png" (for your deceptive chart). Please follow the file naming convention exactly, use the correct file extension for your images (either .png or .jpg), and be sure your images are sized for a reasonable viewing experience. Viewers should not have to zoom or scroll in order to view your submission!

Remember, the visualization itself should not give away which design is earnest and which is deceptive; the file names will be randomized by the course staff prior to peer review.

In addition, submit your write-up as a plain text file, named "a2_writeup.md", with content that follows the instructions above. Please do not include your name and UW NetID in this write-up.

After uploading, please ensure that you can view both designs and the writeup in your Gradescope submission. Do not upload a zip archive with your files. Uploads that require manual correction by the course staff may result in point deductions.

Do not worry about resubmissions, feel free to resubmit as needed prior to the deadline (if you are using late days to do a resubmission, please notify the course staff).

Acknowledgments

The design of this assignment is largely based on the experience and recommendations of Niklas Elmqvist at the University of Maryland, College Park, and a similar assignment from Arvind Satyanarayan from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Computer Science & Engineering - University of Washington