Restaurant space and customer interaction

CSE 510
Lab 2: Ethnographic Field Exercise No. 2 (Space & Interactions)
5 April 2001
Ken Yasuhara

I chose to study the organization of space at Kiku Tempura House, a local Japanese restaurant.1 Being a restaurant, a public place where people are expected to stay for a short time, brief observations could be conducted without significantly interfering with the place's normal activity. From frequent visits, I noticed that the the small space seems carefully organized to affect customers' interactions in various ways, most prominently promoting the fast movement of customers through the ordering and eating process without significantly compromising comfort and satisfaction with service.

the ordering process mirrored in spatial organization

This diagram outlines the interior of Kiku, which mainly consists of a large dining room with a cashier counter in the back. As a customer enters the restaurant, attention is drawn to a large, backlit photograph menu board on the right wall. This wall and a long dining counter section define a corridor to the right end of the cashier counter at the back of the room, which ensures that the customer sees the menu before reaching the register. The absence of seating or a waiting area indicates that this restaurant does not provide table service. Customers are unlikely to spend too much time standing while making a decision and most proceed to ordering in under a minute.

The narrow corridor in front of the cashier counter implies that customers should line up parallel to it. Two spatial cues suggest that the front of the line is on the left. First, the menu corridor naturally feeds into the cashier counter corridor. Second, the cash register is placed at the far left end of the cashier counter, and since payment is the customary conclusion to ordering at restaurants without table service, placement at the end of the back counter mirrors the process.

A refrigerated display case at the register holds soda, juices, and other bottled drinks. Its placement makes it visible to the customer just as the order is made, making it convenient to add a drink to the order. Within a couple minutes of entering, the customer places an order, is issued a number, and finds a seat in the dining area. When the meal is ready, the number is called, and the customer picks it up next to the register on a tray. Leaving the ordering area, the customer must pass a utensil and water station. The space is organized such that the sequence of the main features of the space (menu, register, drinks, utensils) which the customer encounters mirrors the sequence of steps in the typical ordering process.

single customers, groups, and seating

The seats are high, round stools at long counters on the periphery and a long, narrow table in the center. Being stools, the seats have no backs, and while they are comfortable for shorter periods, many customers finish eating within thirty minutes and clear out.

Rather than organize seating in a set of smaller tables, seating two or four, seating customers next to each other, counter style, allows more customers to fit in the area. It also offers advantages in flexibility and manageability, in that seating groups of various sizes does not require moving tables together. These advantages come at a cost, of course, in that a room of smaller tables would afford couples and small groups more privacy and facilitate face-to-face conversation in groups larger than two. With three or more people sitting counter style, conversation with people other than those seated on either side is more difficult.

Based on informal observations, I suspect that the counter and seating layout influences where certain kinds of parties (e.g. unaccompanied customers, couples, larger groups) sit and even whether they choose to eat at Kiku. Most of Kiku's customers come in ones or twos, rather than larger groups. This might be because seating for one or two people is plentiful and varied, either at the center table, e.g. if a couple prefers to sit face-to-face, or along the outer counters, where having a window or wall in front might offer a greater sense of privacy. On more than one occasion, I have noticed a special subgroup of customers, regulars who have established friendships with the restaurant staff, choose counter seating at the back, facing the cashier counter, where they can converse with the staff during slower moments.

In contrast, a larger group would have to sit at the middle table if it wanted a seating arrangement such that each person could directly face and speak to every other. With only one place that could seat such a group, the chances of space being available are slim during popular hours at such a busy establishment.

summary

Overall, the division of space and the arrangement of seating seem to be geared for fast, basic service for high turnover in a customer pool of individuals or small groups. I cannot say whether the design features discussed here were intentional, let alone with the intentions conjectured, but informal observations suggest so. More extensive observation including gathering statistics such as time spent in different stages of the customer process, seating by group size, conversation patterns by group size, etc., might yield stronger support for these ideas.


1Kiku Tempura House, 5018 University Way NE, Seattle, WA