Re: [Cse461] Re: TTL Specifications

From: Abhinav Jain (jain0122_at_cs.washington.edu)
Date: Mon Jan 12 2004 - 11:10:23 PST

  • Next message: Evan Martin: "Re: [Cse461] Re: TTL Specifications"

    Just a confirmation... I believe that sequence numbers are just plain
    numbers indicating the nth packet we sent out,,, so i believe every node
    will have sequence numbers from 1 to n

    while TTL field should be 1 to maxTTL..

    Please correct me if I am on the wrong track.

    Thanks

    Abhinav
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Janet Davis" <jlnd_at_cs.washington.edu>
    To: <cse461_at_cs.washington.edu>
    Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:54 AM
    Subject: [Cse461] Re: TTL Specifications

    > An addendum:
    >
    > The range of valid sequence numbers is 1..MAX_TTL. When you originate a
    > packet, its TTL should be MAX_TTL when you call sendPkt. For forwarding,
    > also note that you can't send a packet with TTL 0.
    >
    > On the receiving side, you should accept (i.e., process) any packet that
    > has a valid TTL when it arrives.
    >
    > Cheers,
    > Janet
    >
    > On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Janet Davis wrote:
    >
    > > The important thing to note is that it is not valid to send a packet
    with
    > > TTL=0. This implies that when you get a packet with TTL=1, you should
    > > process it if you are its destination---and then drop it if its TTL
    > > becomes 0. You can generalize this rule to higher TTL values.
    > >
    > > Cheers,
    > > Janet
    > >
    > > On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Alissa Harrison wrote:
    > >
    > > > Janet,
    > > >
    > > > My partner and I were discussing the specification for decrementing
    > > > TTLs. We think that because there is ambiguity between when a TTL gets
    > > > decremented that interoperability problems could arise. This would
    > > > happen if one app decremented the TTL on the send while another
    > > > decremented on the recieve of a packet (when talking to another
    student,
    > > > we found we were disagreeing when to decrement). Shouldn't there be a
    > > > clear guideline for the whole class?
    > > >
    > > > Alissa and Jon
    > >
    > > --
    > > Janet Davis
    > > jlnd_at_cs.washington.edu
    > > http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/jlnd/
    > >
    > >
    >
    > --
    > Janet Davis
    > jlnd_at_cs.washington.edu
    > http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/jlnd/
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Cse461 mailing list
    > Cse461_at_cs.washington.edu
    > http://mailman.cs.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/cse461
    >

    _______________________________________________
    Cse461 mailing list
    Cse461_at_cs.washington.edu
    http://mailman.cs.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/cse461


  • Next message: Evan Martin: "Re: [Cse461] Re: TTL Specifications"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Mon Jan 12 2004 - 11:10:32 PST