[Cse461] Re: TTL Specifications

From: Janet Davis (jlnd_at_cs.washington.edu)
Date: Sun Jan 11 2004 - 19:37:18 PST

  • Next message: Jon Keto: "[Cse461] Node Timer"

    The important thing to note is that it is not valid to send a packet with
    TTL=0. This implies that when you get a packet with TTL=1, you should
    process it if you are its destination---and then drop it if its TTL
    becomes 0. You can generalize this rule to higher TTL values.

    Cheers,
    Janet

    On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Alissa Harrison wrote:

    > Janet,
    >
    > My partner and I were discussing the specification for decrementing
    > TTLs. We think that because there is ambiguity between when a TTL gets
    > decremented that interoperability problems could arise. This would
    > happen if one app decremented the TTL on the send while another
    > decremented on the recieve of a packet (when talking to another student,
    > we found we were disagreeing when to decrement). Shouldn't there be a
    > clear guideline for the whole class?
    >
    > Alissa and Jon

    -- 
    Janet Davis
    jlnd_at_cs.washington.edu
    http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/jlnd/
    _______________________________________________
    Cse461 mailing list
    Cse461_at_cs.washington.edu
    http://mailman.cs.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/cse461
    

  • Next message: Jon Keto: "[Cse461] Node Timer"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sun Jan 11 2004 - 19:37:21 PST