|
|
|
Note that two
use cases were determined to be high priority, that's why they were explored
and decomposed. Of the elements of those use cases, some of them provided the
priority, some didn't
|
|
|
|
What happened:
|
|
two use cases were identified has high
priority
|
|
use cases were taken down to PL3 (maybe 4)
by business analysts
|
|
use cases were decomposed by architect/tech
lead
|
|
|
|
Note: XP starts
directly with the stories, doesn't have use case superstructure on it
|
|
|
|
Also note some
stories from the technical guys. Perhaps infrastructure storied, or a better
build process…
|
