CSE390D Notes for Wednesday, 9/25/24

In lecture we discussed the idea that there are 16 possible truth tables for a binary logical operator. Many of these 16 have a specific name or can be described in a simple way. Some are somewhat stupid operators because they ignore one or both of their arguments. Here are the tables we ended up with:

p q contradiction
F
NOR
p ↓ q
not reverse
implication?
¬ p not
implication?
¬ q XOR
p ⊕ q
NAND
p | q
TT FFFF FFFF
TF FFFF TTTT
FT FFTT FFTT
FF FTFT FTFT
 
p q and
p ∧ q
biconditional
p ↔ q
also XNOR
q implication
p → q
p reverse
implication
p ← q
or
p ∨ q
tautology
T
TT TTTT TTTT
TF FFFF TTTT
FT FFTT FFTT
FF FTFT FTFT

Some important vocabulary associated with these operators:


Stuart Reges
Last modified: Mon Sep 30 10:55:45 PDT 2024