In this lab, you will be writing a dynamic storage allocator for C programs, i.e., your own version of the malloc and free routines. This is a classic implementation problem with many interesting algorithms and opportunities to put several of the skills you have learned in this course to good use. It is quite involved. Start early!
wget https://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse351/23sp/files/labs/lab5.tar.gzRunning tar xvf lab5.tar.gz will extract the lab files to a directory called lab5.
The only file you will modify and turn in is mm.c (unless you decide to do extra credit). You may find the short README file useful to read.
(In the following instructions, we will assume that you are executing programs on the CSE VM or in your local directory on attu. For this lab, you can work anywhere there's a C compiler and make.)
Your dynamic storage allocator will consist of the following three functions (and several helper functions), which are declared in mm.hand defined in mm.c:
int mm_init(void);
void* mm_malloc(size_t size);
void mm_free(void* ptr);The mm.c file we have given you partially implements an allocator using an explicit free list. Your job is to complete this implementation by filling out mm_mallocand mm_free. The three main memory management functions should work as follows:
mm_init (provided): Before calling mm_malloc ormm_free, the application program ( i.e., the trace-driven driver program that you will use to evaluate your implementation) calls mm_init to perform any necessary initializations, such as allocating the initial heap area. The return value is -1 if there was a problem in performing the initialization, 0 otherwise.
mm_malloc: The mm_malloc routine returns a pointer to an allocated block payload of at least sizebytes. (size_t is a type for describing sizes; it's an unsigned integer that can represent a size spanning all of memory, so on x86_64 it is a 64-bit unsigned value.) The entire allocated block should lie within the heap region and should not overlap with any other allocated block.
mm_free: The mm_free routine frees the block pointed to by ptr. It returns nothing. This routine is guaranteed to work only when the passed pointer (ptr) was returned by an earlier call to mm_malloc and has not yet been freed. These semantics match the semantics of the corresponding malloc and free routines in libc. Type man malloc in the shell for complete documentation.
We will compare your implementation to the version of malloc supplied in the standard C library (libc). Since the libc malloc always returns payload pointers that are aligned to 8 bytes, your malloc implementation should do likewise and always return 8-byte aligned pointers.
We define a block_info struct designed to be used as a node in a doubly-linked explicit free list, and the following functions for manipulating free lists:
block_info* search_free_list(size_t req_size): returns a block of at least the requested size if one exists (and NULLotherwise).
void insert_free_block(block_info* free_block): inserts the given block in the free list in a LIFO manner.
void remove_free_block(block_info* free_block): removes the given block from the free list.
In addition, we implement mm_init and provide two helper functions implementing important parts of the allocator:
void request_more_space(size_t req_size): enlarges the heap by req_size bytes (if enough memory is available on the machine to do so).
void coalesce_free_block(block_info* old_block): coalesces any other free blocks adjacent in memory to old_block into a single new large block and updates the free list accordingly.
Finally, we use a number of C static inline functions and preprocessor macros to extract common pieces of code (constants, annoying casts/pointer manipulation) that might be prone to error. Each is documented in the code. You are welcome to create your own macros as well, though the ones already included in mm.c are the only ones we used in our sample solution, so it's possible without more. For more info on macros, check the GCC manual.
FREE_LIST_HEAD: returns a pointer to the first block in the free list (the head of the free list).
UNSCALED_POINTER_ADD and UNSCALED_POINTER_SUB: useful for calculating pointers without worrying about the size of struct block_info.
Other short utilities for extracting the size field and determining block size.
Additionally, for debugging purposes, you may want to print the contents of the heap. This can be accomplished with the provided examine_heap() function.
The memlib.c package simulates the memory system for your dynamic memory allocator. In your allocator, you can call the following functions (if you use the provided code for an explicit free list, most uses of the memory system calls are already covered):
void* mem_sbrk(int incr): Expands the heap by incr bytes, where incr is a positive nonzero integer and returns a pointer to the first byte of the newly allocated heap area. The semantics are identical to the Unix sbrk function, except that mem_sbrk accepts only a positive nonzero integer argument. (Run man sbrk if you want to learn more about what this does in Unix.)
void* mem_heap_lo(): Returns a pointer to the first byte in the heap.
void* mem_heap_hi(): Returns a pointer to the last byte in the heap.
size_t mem_heapsize(): Returns the current size of the heap in bytes.
size_t mem_pagesize(): Returns the system's page size in bytes (4K on Linux systems).
The driver program mdriver.c in the lab5.tar.gz distribution tests your mm.cpackage for correctness, space utilization, and throughput. Use the command make to generate the driver code and run it with the command ./mdriver -V (the -V flag displays helpful summary information as described below).
The driver program is controlled by a set of trace filesthat it will expect to find in a subdirectory called traces. The .tar.gz file provided to you should unpack into a directory structure that places the traces subdirectory in the correct location relative to the driver. (If you want to move the trace files around, you can update the TRACEDIR path in config.h).
Each trace file contains a sequence of allocate and free directions that instruct the driver to call your mm_malloc and mm_free routines in some sequence. The driver and the trace files are the same ones we will use when we grade your submitted mm.c file. Trace files are structured in the following manner:
20000 # suggested heap size (unused)
2 # number of ids -- in this case, 0-1
4 # number of alloc + free operations
1 # weight for this tracefile (unused)
a 0 2040 # alloc block "0" with payload size 2040
a 1 2040 # alloc block "1" with payload size 2040
f 1 # free block "1"
f 0 # free block "0"The mdriver executable accepts the following command line arguments:
-t <tracedir>: Look for the default trace files in directory tracedir instead of the default directory defined in config.h.
-f <tracefile>: Use one particular tracefile for testing instead of the default set of tracefiles.
-h: Print a summary of the command line arguments.
-l: Run and measure libc malloc in addition to the student's malloc package.
-v: Verbose output. Print a performance breakdown for each tracefile in a compact table.
-V: More verbose output. Prints additional diagnostic information as each trace file is processed. Useful during debugging for determining which trace file is causing your malloc package to fail.
You should not change any of the interfaces in mm.c(e.g., names of functions, number and type of parameters, etc.).
You should not invoke any memory-management related library calls or system calls. This means you cannot usemalloc, calloc, free, realloc, sbrk, brkor any variants of these calls in your code. (You may use all the functions in memlib.c, of course.)
You are not allowed to define any global or staticcompound data structures such as arrays, structs, trees, or lists in your mm.c program. You are allowed to declare global scalar variables such as integers, floats, and pointers in mm.c, but try to keep these to a minimum. (It is possible to complete the implementation of the explicit free list without adding any global variables.)
For consistency with the malloc implementation in libc, which returns blocks aligned on 8-byte boundaries, your allocator must always return pointers that are aligned to 8-byte boundaries. The driver will enforce this requirement for you.
In general we encourage students to discuss ideas from the labs and homeworks. Please refer to the course collaboration policy for a reminder on what is appropriate behavior. In particular, we remind you that referring to solutions from previous quarters or from a similar course at another university or on the web is cheating. As is done in CSE 142 and 143, we will run similarity-detection software over submitted student programs, including programs from past quarters. Please start early and make use of all the resources we provide (office hours, Message Board) to help you succeed!
Your grade will be calculated (as a percentage) out of a total of 53 points as follows:
Correctness (36 points). You will receive 4 points for each test performed by the driver program that your solution passes. (9 tests)
Style (6 points). This lab requires a significant amount of C programming, so we will be expecting you to use proper style. That being said, this isn't a programming course, so what we're asking for won't be anything unreasonable. This part of your grade should be relatively stress-free, so we've explicitly stated what we will be looking for:
Comments: Since some of the pointer manipulation inherent to allocators can be confusing, we expect to see short inline comments explaining your code, as well as function headers for any helper functions you may define. (These will also help us give you partial credit if you have a partially working implementation.)
Macros and Static Inline Functions: You should use the provided macros and static inline functions when appropriate. You should not reimplement code or hard-code constants when there exists a macro or static inline that does this for you.
Readability: Your TAs will be reading through your implementation while grading, so write your code with that in mind. Some things to think about include using proper indentation, descriptive variable names, etc. If you are comfortable with general 143 style, that should be sufficient.
Performance (5 points). Performance represents a small portion of your grade. We are most concerned about the correctness of your implementation. For the most part, a correct implementation will yield reasonable performance. Two performance metrics will be used to evaluate your solution:
Space utilization: The peak ratio between the aggregate amount of memory used by the driver (i.e., allocated viamm_malloc but not yet freed viamm_free) and the size of the heap used by your allocator. The optimal ratio is 1, although in practice we will not be able to achieve that ratio. You should find good policies to minimize fragmentation in order to make this ratio as close as possible to the optimal.
Throughput: The average number of operations completed per second.
The driver program summarizes the performance of your allocator by computing a performance index, P, which is a weighted sum of the space utilization and throughput:
P = 0.6U + 0.4 min (1, T/Tlibc)libcmalloc on your system on the default traces. The performance index favors space utilization over throughput. You will receive 5(P+ 0.1) points, rounded up to the closest whole point. For example, a solution with a performance index of 0.63 or 63% will receive 4 performance points.Our complete version of the explicit free list allocator has a performance index between just over 0.7 and 0.8; it would receive a full 5 points. Thus if you have a performance index GREATER THAN 0.7 (mdriver prints this as "70/100") then you will get the full 5 points for Performance. Observing that both memory and CPU cycles are expensive system resources, we adopt this formula to encourage balanced optimization of both memory utilization and throughput. Ideally, the performance index will reach P = 1 or 100% (although we will not be able to acheive this in practice). To receive a good performance score, you must achieve a balance between utilization and throughput.
We are providing some extra homework-style practice problems for memory allocation in case you find them helpful in preparing for lab 5. You do not need to submit these, they are just good practice. Read section 9.9 from the textbook for review. (Note “word” means 4 bytes for these problems)
This heap simulator is a helpful tool to get you familiar with the operations of the heap. Beyond allocating and freeing blocks, you can also export your simulation and save it as a trace file. You can then run your lab 5 solution with these custom trace files as described in the debugging section below.
Use the mdriver -f option. During initial development, using tiny trace files will simplify debugging and testing. We have included two such trace files (short1-bal.repand short2-bal.rep) that you can use for initial debugging.
Use the mdriver -v and -V options. The-v option will give you a detailed summary for each trace file. The -V will also indicate when each trace file is read, which will help you isolate errors.
Compile with gcc -g and use gdb. The -gflag tells gcc to include debugging symbols, so gdb can follow the source code as it steps through the executable. TheMakefile should already be set up to do this. A debugger will help you isolate and identify out of bounds memory references. You can specify any command line arguments for mdriver after the runcommand in gdb (e.g., run -f short1-bal.rep).
Keep in mind that the last "block" in the heap is a special marker we will call the heap footer that is allocated and has size 0. The heap footer's tags need to be maintained as well.
Understand every line of the malloc implementation in the textbook. The textbook has a detailed example of a simple allocator based on an implicit free list. Use this as a point of departure. Don't start working on your allocator until you understand everything about the simple implicit list allocator.
Write a function that treats the heap as an implicit list, and prints all header information from all the blocks in the heap. Usingfprintf to print to stderr is helpful here because standard error is not buffered so you will get output from your print statements even if the next statement crashes your program.
Encapsulate your pointer arithmetic in C preprocessor macros. Pointer arithmetic in memory managers is confusing and error-prone because of all the casting that is necessary. We have supplied inline functions that do this: see UNSCALED_POINTER_ADD andUNSCALED_POINTER_SUB.
Use a profiler. You may find the gprof tool helpful for optimizing performance. (man gprof or searching online forgprof documentation will get you the basics.) If you use gprof, see the hint about debugging above for how to pass extra arguments to GCC in the Makefile.
Start early! It is possible to write an efficient malloc package with a few pages of code. However, we can guarantee that it will be some of the most difficult and sophisticated code you have written so far in your career. So start early, and good luck!
This is an optional, but recommended, addition that will help you check to see if your allocator is doing what it should (or figure out what it's doing wrong if not). Dynamic memory allocators are notoriously tricky beasts to program correctly and efficiently. They are difficult to program correctly because they involve a lot of untyped pointer manipulation. In addition to the usual debugging techniques, you may find it helpful to write a heap checker that scans the heap and checks it for consistency.
Some examples of what a heap checker might check are:
Your heap checker will consist of the function int mm_check(void) in mm.c. Feel free to rename it, break it into several functions, and call it wherever you want. It should check any invariants or consistency conditions you consider prudent. It returns a nonzero value if and only if your heap is consistent. This is not required, but may prove useful. When you submit mm.c, make sure to remove any calls to mm_check as they will slow down your throughput.
As optional extra credit, implement a final memory allocation-related function: mm_realloc. Write your implementation inmm-realloc.c.
The signature for this function, which you will find in your mm.h file, is:
extern void* mm_realloc(void* ptr, size_t size);Similarly, you should find the following in your mm-realloc.c file:
void* mm_realloc(void* ptr, size_t size) {
// ... implementation here ...
}
To receive credit, you should follow the contract of the C library'srealloc exactly (pretending that malloc andfree are mm_malloc and mm_free, etc.). The man page entry for realloc says:
The realloc() function changes the size of the memory block pointed to by
ptr to size bytes. The contents will be unchanged in the range from the
start of the region up to the minimum of the old and new sizes. If the
new size is larger than the old size, the added memory will not be
initialized. If ptr is NULL, then the call is equivalent to
malloc(size), for all values of size; if size is equal to zero, and ptr
is not NULL, then the call is equivalent to free(ptr). Unless ptr is
NULL, it must have been returned by an earlier call to malloc(), calloc()
or realloc(). If the area pointed to was moved, a free(ptr) is done.
A good test would be to compare the behavior of your mm_realloc to that of realloc, checking each of the above cases. Your implementation of mm_realloc should also be performant. Avoid copying memory if possible, making use of nearby free blocks. You should not use memcpy to copy memory; instead, copyWORD_SIZE bytes at a time to the new destination while iterating over the existing data.
To run tracefiles that test mm_realloc, compile usingmake mdriver-realloc. Then, run mdriver-reallocwith the -f flag to specify a tracefile, or first editconfig.h to include additional realloc tracefiles (realloc-bal.rep and realloc2-bal.rep) in the default list.
Don't forget to submit your finished mm-realloc.c along with mm.c.
Do NOT spend time on this part until you have finished and turned in the core assignment.
In this extra credit portion, you will implement a basic mark and sweep garbage collector. Write your implementation in mm-gc.c.
Some additional notes:
To test the current garbage collector, use make mdriver-garbage which generates an executable called mdriver-garbage.
The driver assumes that you have a correctly working mm_malloc and mm_free implementation.
The tester checks that all of the blocks that should have been freed are freed and that all of the others remain allocated. On success it prints "Success! The garbage collector passed all of the tests". You can look in GarbageCollectorDriver.c to see what the test code does.
This implementation assumes that the alignment is 8 bytes because the third bit of sizeAndTags is used as the mark bit to mark the block.
The function is_pointer only looks for pointers that point to the beginning of a payload (like Java), and will return false if it points to a free block.
Pointers will always be word aligned in the data block.
Don't forget to submit your finished mm-gc.c along with mm.c.
Go back to part_5 of lab0.c and add a malloc statement with 16 as its argument before the malloc for class_grades. Recompile the file and examine the difference in the addresses of the two heap blocks in part_5. Play around with the size of the new malloc-ed block and answer the following questions (don't assume the implementation is from the first part of the lab):
Submit your completed mm.cand lab5synthesis.txt files to the "Lab 5" assignment on Gradescope.
If you completed the extra credit, submit your mm.c, mm-realloc.c (if you did mm-realloc) and mm-gc.c (if you implemented the garbage collector) files to the "Lab 5 Extra Credit" assignment on Gradescope.
After submitting, please wait until the autograder is done running and double-check that you passed the "File Check" and "Compilation and Execution Issues" tests. If either test returns a score of -1, be sure to read the output and fix any problems before resubmitting. Failure to do so will result in a programming score of 0 for the lab.
It is fine to submit multiple times up until the deadline, we will only grade your last submission. NOTE that if you do re-submit, you MUST RE-submit ALL files again.