3.1 The Permission Classes
The permission classes represent access to system resources. The java.security.Permission class is an abstract class and is subclassed, as appropriate, to represent specific accesses. For example, the following Java code can be used to produce a permission to read the file named "abc" in the /tmp directory:
perm = new java.io.FilePermission("/tmp/abc", "read");
New permissions are subclassed either from the Permission class or one of its subclasses, such as java.security.BasicPermission. Subclassed permissions (other than BasicPermission) generally belong to their own packages. Thus, FilePermission is found in the java.io package.
A crucial abstract method that needs to be implemented for each new class of permission is the "implies" method. Basically, "a implies b" means that if one is granted permission "a", one is naturally granted permission "b". This is important when making access control decisions.
Associated with the abstract class java.security.Permission are the abstract class named java.security.PermissionCollection and the final class java.security.Permissions.
Class java.security.PermissionCollection represents a collection (i.e., a set that allows duplicates) of Permission objects for a single category (such as file permissions), for ease of grouping. For example, file permissions can be added to the PermissionCollection object in any order. In such cases, it is crucial that PermissionCollection ensures that the correct semantics are followed when the implies function is called.
Class java.security.Permissions represents a collection of collections of Permission objects, or in other words, a super collection of heterogeneous permissions.
Applications are free to add new categories of permissions that the system supports. How to add such application-specific permissions is discussed later in this document.
Now we describe the syntax and semantics of all built-in permissions.
3.1.1 java.security.Permission
This abstract class is the ancestor of all permissions. It defines the essential functionalities required for all permissions.
Each permission instance is typically generated by passing one or more string parameters to the constructor. In a common case with two parameters, the first parameter is usually "the name of the target" (such as the name of a file for which the permission is aimed), and the second parameter is the action (such as "read" action on a file). Generally, a set of actions can be specified together as a comma-separated composite string.
3.1.2 java.security.PermissionCollection
This class hold a homogeneous collection of permissions. In other words, each instance of the class holds only permissions of the same type.
3.1.3 java.security.Permissions
This class is designed to hold a heterogeneous collection of permissions. Basically, it is a collection of java.security.PermissionCollection objects.
3.1.4 java.security.UnresolvedPermission
Recall that the internal state of a security policy is normally expressed by the permission objects that are associated with each code source. Given the dynamic nature of Java technology, however, it is possible that when the policy is given the actual code that implements a particular permission class has not yet been loaded (or not even available for loading) and defined in the Java runtime. The UnresolvedPermission class is used to hold such "unresolved" permissions. Similarly, the class java.security.UnresolvedPermissionCollection stores a collection of UnresolvedPermission permissions.
During access control, an unresolved permission is "resolved" and the appropriate decision is made. That is, a new object of the appropriate class type is instantiated, if possible, based on the information in the UnresolvedPermission. This new object replaces the UnresolvedPermission, which is removed.
If the permission is still unresolvable at this time, the permission is considered invalid, as if it is never granted in a security policy.
3.1.5 java.io.FilePermission
The targets for this class can be specified in the following ways, where directory and file names are strings that cannot contain white spaces.
file
directory (same as directory/)
directory/file
directory/* (all files in this directory)
* (all files in the current directory)
directory/- (all files in the file system under this directory)
- (all files in the file system under the current directory)
"<<ALL FILES>>" (all files in the file system)
Note that "<<ALL FILES>>" is a special string denoting all files in the system. On a Unix system, this includes all files under the root directory. On an MS-DOS system, this includes all files on all drives.
The actions are: read, write, delete, and execute. Therefore, the following are valid code samples for creating file permissions:
import java.io.FilePermission;
FilePermission p = new FilePermission("myfile", "read,write");
FilePermission p = new FilePermission("/home/gong/", "read");
FilePermission p = new FilePermission("/tmp/mytmp", "read,delete");
FilePermission p = new FilePermission("/bin/*", "execute");
FilePermission p = new FilePermission("*", "read");
FilePermission p = new FilePermission("/-", "read,execute");
FilePermission p = new FilePermission("-", "read,execute");
FilePermission p = new FilePermission("<<ALL FILES>>", "read");
The implies() method in this class correctly interprets the file system. For example, FilePermission("/-", "read,execute") implies FilePermission("/home/gong/public_html/index.html", "read"), and FilePermission("bin/*", "execute") implies FilePermission("bin/emacs19.31", "execute").
Note: Most of these strings are given in platform-dependent format. For example, to represent read access to the file named "foo" in the "temp" directory on the C drive of a Windows system, you would use
FilePermission p = new FilePermission("c:\\temp\\foo", "read");
The double backslashes are necessary to represent a single backslash because the strings are processed by a tokenizer (java.io.StreamTokenizer), which allows "\" to be used as an escape string (e.g., "\n" to indicate a new line) and which thus requires two backslashes to indicate a single backslash. After the tokenizer has processed the above FilePermission target string, converting double backslashes to single backslashes, the end result is the actual path
"c:\temp\foo"
It is necessary that the strings be given in platform-dependent format until there is a universal file description language. Note also that the use of meta symbols such as "*" and "-" prevents the use of specific file names. We think this is a small limitation that can be tolerated for the moment. Finally, note that "/-" and "<<ALL FILES>>" are the same target on Unix systems in that they both refer to the entire file system. (They can refer to multiple file systems if they are all available). The two targets are potentially different on other operating systems, such as MS Windows and MacOS.
Also note that a target name that specifies just a directory, with a "read" action, as in
FilePermission p = new FilePermission("/home/gong/", "read");
means you are only giving permission to list the files in that directory, not read any of them. To allow read access to files, you must specify either an explicit file name, or an "*" or "-", as in
FilePermission p = new FilePermission("/home/gong/myfile", "read");
FilePermission p = new FilePermission("/home/gong/*", "read");
FilePermission p = new FilePermission("/home/gong/-", "read");
And finally, note that code always automatically has permission to read files from its same CodeSource (and subdirectories of that CodeSource); it does not need explicit permission to do so.
3.1.6 java.net.SocketPermission
This class represents access to a network via sockets. The target for this class can be given as "hostname:port_range", where hostname can be given in the following ways:
hostname (a single host)
IP address (a single host)
localhost (the local machine)
"" (equivalent to "localhost")
hostname.domain (a single host within the domain)
hostname.subdomain.domain
*.domain (all hosts in the domain)
*.subdomain.domain
* (all hosts)
That is, the host is expressed as a DNS name, as a numerical IP address, as "localhost" (for the local machine) or as "" (which is equivalent to specifying "localhost").
The wildcard "*" may be included once in a DNS name host specification. If it is included, it must be in the leftmost position, as in "*.sun.com".
The port_range can be given as follows:
N (a single port)
N- (all ports numbered N and above)
-N (all ports numbered N and below)
N1-N2 (all ports between N1 and N2, inclusive)
Here N, N1, and N2 are non-negative integers ranging from 0 to 65535 (2^16-1).
The actions on sockets are accept, connect, listen, and resolve (which is basically DNS lookup). Note that implicitly, the action "resolve" is implied by "accept", "connect", and "listen" -- i.e., those who can listen or accept incoming connections from or initiate out-going connections to a host should be able to look up the name of the remote host.
Below are some examples of socket permissions.
import java.net.SocketPermission;
SocketPermission p = new SocketPermission("java.sun.com","accept");
p = new SocketPermission("204.160.241.99","accept");
p = new SocketPermission("*.com","connect");
p = new SocketPermission("*.sun.com:80","accept");
p = new SocketPermission("*.sun.com:-1023","accept");
p = new SocketPermission("*.sun.com:1024-","connect");
p = new SocketPermission("java.sun.com:8000-9000",
"connect,accept");
p = new SocketPermission("localhost:1024-",
"accept,connect,listen");
Note that SocketPermission("java.sun.com:80,8080","accept") and SocketPermission("java.sun.com,javasun.sun.com","accept") are not valid socket permissions.
Moreover, because listen is an action that applies only to ports on the local host, whereas accept is an action that applies to ports on both the local and remote host, both actions are necessary.
3.1.7 java.security.BasicPermission
The BasicPermission class extends the Permission class. It can be used as the base class for permissions that want to follow the same naming convention as BasicPermission (see below).
The name for a BasicPermission is the name of the given permission (for example, "exitVM","setFactory", "queueprintJob", etc). The naming convention follows the hierarchical property naming convention. An asterisk may appear at the end of the name, following a ".", or by itself, to signify a wildcard match. For example: "java.*" or "*" is valid, "*java" or "a*b" is not valid.
The action string (inherited from Permission) is unused.Thus, BasicPermission is commonly used as the base class for "named" permissions (ones that contain a name but no actions list; you either have the named permission or you don't.) Subclasses may implement actions on top of BasicPermission, if desired.
Some of the BasicPermission subclasses are java.lang.RuntimePermission, java.security.SecurityPermission, java.util.PropertyPermission, and java.net.NetPermission.
3.1.8 java.util.PropertyPermission
The targets for this class are basically the names of Java properties as set in various property files. Targets can be specified as "*" (any property), "a.*" (any property whose name has a prefix "a."), "a.b.*", and so on. Note that the wildcard can occur only once and can only be at the rightmost position.
This is one of the BasicPermission subclasses that implements actions on top of BasicPermission. The actions are "read" and "write". Their meaning is defined as follows: "read" permission allows the getProperty() method in java.lang.System to be called to get the property value, and "write" permission allows the setProperty() method to be called to set the property value.
3.1.9 java.lang.RuntimePermission
The target for a RuntimePermission can be represented by any string, and there is no action associated with the targets. For example, RuntimePermission("exitVM") denotes the permission to exit the Java virtual machine.
The target names are:
createClassLoader
getClassLoader
setContextClassLoader
exitVM
setFactory
setIO
modifyThread
modifyThreadGroup
getProtectionDomain
readFileDescriptor
writeFileDescriptor
loadLibrary.{library name}
accessClassInPackage.{package name}
defineClassInPackage.{package name}
accessDeclaredMembers.{class name}
queuePrintJob
3.1.10 java.awt.AWTPermission
This is in the same spirit as the RuntimePermission. Some of the targets for this class are:
showWindowWithoutWarningBanner
accessClipboard
accessEventQueue
3.1.11 java.net.NetPermission
This class contains the following targets and no actions:
setDefaultAuthenticator
requestPasswordAuthentication
3.1.12 java.lang.reflect.ReflectPermission
This is the Permission class for reflective operations. A ReflectPermission is a named permission (like RuntimePermission) and has no actions. The only name currently defined is
suppressAccessChecks
which allows suppressing the standard Java language access checks -- for public, default (package) access, protected, and private members -- performed by reflected objects at their point of use.
3.1.13 java.io.SerializablePermission
This class contains the following targets and no actions:
enableSubclassImplementation
enableSubstitution
3.1.14 java.security.SecurityPermission
SecurityPermissions control access to security-related objects, such as Security, Policy, Provider, Signer, and Identity objects. This class contains the following targets and no actions:
getPolicy
setPolicy
getProperty.{key}
setProperty.{key}
insertProvider.{provider name}
removeProvider.{provider name}
setSystemScope
setIdentityPublicKey
setIdentityInfo
addIdentityCertificate
removeIdentityCertificate
clearProviderProperties.{provider name}
putProviderProperty.{provider name}
removeProviderProperty.{provider name}
getSignerPrivateKey
setSignerKeyPair
3.1.15 java.security.AllPermission
This permission implies all permissions. It is introduced to simplify the work of system administrators who might need to perform multiple tasks that require all (or numerous) permissions. It would be inconvenient to require the security policy to iterate through all permissions. Note that AllPermission also implies new permissions that are defined in the future.
Clearly much caution is necessary when considering granting this permission.
3.1.16 Discussion on Permission Implications
Recall that permissions are often compared against each other, and to facilitate such comparisons, we require that each permission class defines a method implies() that represents how the particular permission class relates to other permission classes. For example, java.io.FilePermission("/tmp/*", "read") implies java.io.FilePermission("/tmp/a.txt", "read") but does not imply any java.net.NetPermission.
There is another layer of implication that may not be immediately obvious to some readers. Suppose that one applet has been granted the permission to write to the entire file system. This presumbly allows the applet to replace the system binary, including the JVM runtime environment. This effectively means that the applet has been granted all permissions.
Another example is that if an applet is granted the runtime permission to create class loaders, it is effectively granted many more permissions, as a class loader can perform sensitive operations.
Other permissions that are "dangerous" to give out include those that allow the setting of system properties, runtime permissions for defining packages and for loading native code libraries (because the Java security architecture is not designed to and does not prevent malicious behavior at the level of native code), and of course the AllPermission.
3.1.17 How To Create New Types of Permissions
It is essential that no one except JavaSoft should extend the permissions that are built into JDK, either by adding new functionality or by introducing additional keywords into a class such as java.lang.RuntimePermission. This maintains consistency.
To create a new permission, the following steps are recommended, as shown by an example. Suppose an application developer from company ABC wants to create a customized permission to "watch TV".
First, create a new class com.abc.Permission that extends the abstract class java.security.Permission (or one of its subclasses), and another new class com.abc.TVPermission that extends the com.abc.Permission. Make sure that the "implies" method, among others, is correctly implemented. (Of course, com.abc.TVPermission can directly extend java.security.Permission; the intermediate com.abc.Permission is not required.)
public class com.abc.Permission extends java.security.Permission
public class com.abc.TVPermission extends com.abc.Permission
The following figure shows the subclass relationship.
Second, include these new classes with the application package.
Then, put the string representation of this permission in the policy file so that this permission can be automatically configured for each domain granted the permission. (Details of the policy file syntax are given in a later section.) An example of the policy file entry specifying permission to watch channel 5 would be:
permission com.abc.TVPermission "channel-5", "watch";
In the application's resource management code, when checking to see if a permission should be granted, call AccessController's checkPermission method using a com.abc.TVPermission object as the parameter.
com.abc.TVPermission tvperm = new
com.abc.TVPermission("channel-5", "watch");
AccessController.checkPermission(tvperm);
Note that, when adding a new permission, one should create a new (permission) class and not add a new method to the security manager. (In the past, in order to enable checking of a new type of access, you had to add a new method to the SecurityManager class.)
If more elaborate TVPermissions such as "channel-1:13" or "channel-*" are allowed, then it may be necessary to implement a TVPermissionCollection object that knows how to deal with the semantics of these pseudo names.
New code should always invoke a permission check by calling the checkPermission method of the AccessController class in order to exercise the built-in access control algorithm. There is no essential need to examine whether there is a ClassLoader or a SecurityManager. On the other hand, if the algorithm should be left to the installed security manager class, then the method Security.Manager.checkPermission() should be invoked instead.
3.2 java.security.CodeSource
This class extends the concept of a codebase within HTML to encapsulate not only the location (URL) but also the certificate(s) containing public keys that should be used to verify signed code originating from that location. Note that this is not the equivalent of the CodeBase tag in HTML files. Each certificate is represented as a java.security.cert.Certificate, and each URL as a java.net.URL.
3.3 java.security.Policy
The system security policy for a Java runtime (specifying which permissions are available for code from various sources) is represented by a Policy object. More specifically, it is represented by a Policy subclass providing an implementation of the abstract methods in the Policy class.
In order for an applet (or an application running under a SecurityManager) to be allowed to perform secured actions (such as reading or writing a file), the applet (or application) must be granted permission for that particular action. (The only exception is that code always automatically has permission to read files from its same CodeSource (and subdirectories of that CodeSource); it does not need explicit permission to do so.)
There could be multiple instances of the Policy object, although only one is "in effect" at any time. The currently-installed Policy object can be obtained by calling the getPolicy() method, and it can be changed by a call to the setPolicy() method (by code with permission to reset the Policy).
The current policy is consulted by a ProtectionDomain when the protection domain initializes its set of permissions. The protection domain passes in a CodeSource object, which encapsulates its codebase (URL) and certificate attributes. The Policy object evaluates the global policy and returns an appropriate Permissions object specifying the permissions allowed for code from the specified code source.
The source location for the policy information utilized by the Policy object is up to the Policy implementation. The policy configuration may be stored, for example, as a flat ASCII file, as a serialized binary file of the Policy class, or as a database. There is a default Policy implementation that obtains its information from static policy configuration files.
The Policy object is agnostic in that it is not involved in making policy decisions. It is merely the Java runtime representation of the persistent policy configuration.
3.3.1 Policy File Format
In the default Policy implementation, the policy can be specified within one or more policy configuration files. The configuration file(s) specify what permissions are allowed for code from specified code sources.
A policy configuration file essentially contains a list of entries. It may contain a "keystore" entry, and contains zero or more "grant" entries.
A keystore is a database of private keys and their associated digital certificates such as X.509 certificate chains authenticating the corresponding public keys. The keytool utility is used to create and administer keystores. The keystore specified in a policy configuration file is used to look up the public keys of the signers specified in the grant entries of the file. A keystore entry must appear in a policy configuration file if any grant entries specify signer aliases (see below).
At this time, there can be only one keystore entry in the policy file (others after the first one are ignored), and it can appear anywhere outside the file's grant entries . It has the following syntax:
keystore "some_keystore_url", "keystore_type";
where "some_keystore_url" specifies the URL location of the keystore, and "keystore_type" specifies the keystore type.
The URL is relative to the policy file location. Thus if the policy file is specified in the security properties file as:
policy.url.1=http://foo.bar.com/blah/some.policy
and that policy file has an entry:
keystore ".keystore";
then the keystore will be loaded from:
http://foo.bar.com/blah/.keystore
The URL can also be absolute.
A keystore type defines the storage and data format of the keystore information, and the algorithms used to protect private keys in the keystore and the integrity of the keystore itself. The default type supported by Sun Microsystems is a proprietary keystore type named "JKS".
Each grant entry in a policy file essentially consists of a CodeSource and its permissions. (Actually, a CodeSource consists of a URL and a set of certificates, while a policy file entry includes a URL and a list of signer names. The system creates the corresponding CodeSource after consulting the keystore to determine the certificate(s) of the specified signers.)
Each grant entry in the policy file is of the following format, where the leading "grant" is a reserved word that signifies the beginning of a new entry. Within each entry, a leading "permission" is another reserved word that marks the beginning of a new permission in the entry. Each grant entry grants a specified code source a set of permissions.
grant [SignedBy "signer_names"] [, CodeBase "URL"] {
permission permission_class_name [ "target_name" ]
[, "action"] [, SignedBy "signer_names"];
permission ...
};
White spaces are allowed immediately before or after any comma. The name of the permission class must be a fully qualified class name, such as java.io.FilePermission, and cannot be abbreviated (for example, to FilePermission).
Note that the action field is optional in that it can be omitted if the permission class does not require it. If it is present, then it must come immediately after the target field. The CodeBase field (URL) is optional in that, if it is omitted, it signifies "any code base".
The first signer name field is a string alias that is mapped (via a separate mechanism) to a set of public keys that are associated with the signers. These keys are used to verify that certain signed classes are really signed by these signers.
This signer field can be a comma-separated string containing names of multiple signers, an example of which is "Adam,Eve,Charles", which means signed by Adam and Eve and Charles (i.e., the relationship is AND, not OR).
This field is optional in that, if it is omitted, it signifies "any signer", or in other words, "It doesn't matter whether the code is signed or not".
The second signer field, inside a Permission entry, represents the alias to the key that signed the bytecodes that implemented the said permission class. This permission entry is effective (i.e., access control permission will be granted based on this entry) only if the bytecode implementation is verified to be correctly signed by the said alias.
The order between the CodeBase and SignedBy fields does not matter.
An informal BNF grammer for the Policy file format is given below, where non-capitalized terms are terminals:
PolicyFile -> PolicyEntry | PolicyEntry; PolicyFile
PolicyEntry -> grant {PermissionEntry}; |
grant SignerEntry {PermissionEntry} |
grant CodebaseEntry {PermissionEntry} |
grant SignerEntry, CodebaseEntry {PermissionEntry} |
grant CodebaseEntry, SignerEntry {PermissionEntry} |
keystore "url"
SignerEntry -> signedby (a comma-separated list of strings)
CodebaseEntry -> codebase (a string representation of a URL)
PermissionEntry -> OnePermission | OnePermission PermissionEntry
OnePermission -> permission permission_class_name
[ "target_name" ] [, "action_list"]
[, SignerEntry];
Now we give some examples. The following policy grants permission a.b.Foo to code signed by Roland:
grant signedBy "Roland" {
permission a.b.Foo;
};
The following grants a FilePermission to all code (regardless of the signer and/or codeBase):
grant {
permission java.io.FilePermission ".tmp", "read";
};
The following grants two permissions to code that is signed by both Li and Roland:
grant signedBy "Roland,Li" {
permission java.io.FilePermission "/tmp/*", "read";
permission java.util.PropertyPermission "user.*";
};
The following grants two permissions to code that is signed by Li, and that comes from http://java.sun.com:
grant codeBase "http://java.sun.com/", signedBy "Li" {
permission java.io.FilePermission "/tmp/*", "read";
permission java.io.SocketPermission "*", "connect";
};
The following grants two permissions to code that is signed by both Li and Roland, and only if the bytecodes implementing com.abc.TVPermission are genuinely signed by Li.
grant signedBy "Roland,Li" {
permission java.io.FilePermission "/tmp/*", "read";
permission com.abc.TVPermission "channel-5", "watch",
signedBy "Li";
};
The reason for including the second signer field is to prevent spoofing when a permission class does not reside with the Java runtime installation. For example, a copy of the com.abc.TVPermission class can be downloaded as part of a remote JAR archive, and the user policy might include an entry that refers to it. Because the archive is not long-lived, the second time the com.abc.TVPermission class is downloaded, posssibly from a different web site, it is crucial that the second copy is authentic, as the presence of the permission entry in the user policy might reflect the user's confidence or belief in the first copy of the class bytecode.
The reason we chose to use digital signatures to ensure authenticity, rather than storing (a hash value of) the first copy of the bytecodes and using it to compare with the second copy, is because the author of the permission class can legitimately update the class file to reflect a new design or implementation.
Please note: The strings for a file path must be specified in a platform-dependent format; this is necessary until there is a universal file description language. The above examples have shown strings appropriate on Solaris systems. On Windows systems, when you directly specify a file path in a string, you need to include two backslashes for each actual single backslash in the path, as in
grant signedBy "Roland" {
permission java.io.FilePermission "C:\\users\\Cathy\\*", "read";
};
This is because the strings are processed by a tokenizer (java.io.StreamTokenizer), which allows "\" to be used as an escape string (e.g., "\n" to indicate a new line) and which thus requires two backslashes to indicate a single backslash. After the tokenizer has processed the above FilePermission target string, converting double backslashes to single backslashes, the end result is the actual path
"C:\users\Cathy\*"
3.3.2 Property Expansion in Policy Files
Property expansion is possible in policy files and in the security properties file.
Property expansion is similar to expanding variables in a shell. That is, when a string like
"${some.property}"
appears in a policy file, or in the security properties file, it will be expanded to the value of the system property. For example,
permission java.io.FilePermission "${user.home}", "read";
will expand "${user.home}" to use the value of the "user.home" system property. If that property's value is "/home/cathy", then the above is equivalent to
permission java.io.FilePermission "/home/cathy", "read";
In order to assist in platform-independent policy files, you can also use the special notation of "${/}", which is a shortcut for "${file.separator}". This allows things like
permission java.io.FilePermission "${user.home}${/}*", "read";
If user.home is /home/cathy, and we are on Solaris, the above gets converted to:
permission java.io.FilePermission "/home/cathy/*", "read";
If on the other hand user.home is C:\users\cathy and we are on a Windows system, the above gets converted to:
permission java.io.FilePermission "C:\users\cathy\*", "read";
Also, as a special case, if you expand a property in a codebase, such as
grant codeBase "file:/${java.home}/lib/ext/"
then any file.separator characters will be automatically converted to /'s. Thus on a Windows system, the above would get converted to
grant codeBase "file:/C:/jdk1.2/lib/ext/"
even if java.home is set to C:\jdk1.2. Thus you don't need to use ${/} in codebase strings (and you shouldn't).
Property expansion takes place anywhere a double quoted string is allowed in the policy file. This includes the signedby, codebase, target names, and actions fields.
Whether or not property expansion is allowed is controlled by the value of the "policy.expandProperties" property in the security properties file. If the value of this property is true (the default), expansion is allowed.
Please note: You can't use nested properties; they will not work. For example,
"${user.${foo}}"
doesn't work, even if the "foo" property is set to "home". The reason is the property parser doesn't recognize nested properties; it simply looks for the first "${", and then keeps looking until it finds the first "}" and tries to interpret the result "${user.$foo}" as a property, but fails if there is no such property.
Also note: If a property can't be expanded in a grant entry, permission entry, or keystore entry, that entry is ignored. For example, if the system property "foo" is not defined and you have:
grant codeBase "${foo}" {
permission ...;
permission ...;
};
then all the permissions in this grant entry are ignored. If you have
grant {
permission Foo "${foo}";
permission Bar;
};
then only the "permission Foo..." entry is ignored. And finally, if you have
keystore "${foo}";
then the keystore entry is ignored.
One final note: On Windows systems, when you directly specify a file path in a string, you need to include two backslashes for each actual single backslash in the path, as in
"C:\\users\\cathy\\foo.bat"
This is because the strings are processed by a tokenizer (java.io.StreamTokenizer), which allows "\" to be used as an escape string (e.g., "\n" to indicate a new line) and which thus requires two backslashes to indicate a single backslash. After the tokenizer has processed the above string, converting double backslashes to single backslashes, the end result is
"C:\users\cathy\foo.bat"
Expansion of a property in a string takes place after the tokenizer has processed the string. Thus if you have the string
"${user.home}\\foo.bat"
then first the tokenizer processes the string, converting the double backslashes to a single backslash, and the result is
"${user.home}\foo.bat"
Then the ${user.home} property is expanded and the end result is
"C:\users\cathy\foo.bat"
assuming the user.home value is "C:\users\cathy". Of course, for platform independence, it would be better if the string was initially specified without any explicit slashes, i.e., using the ${/} property instead, as in
"${user.home}${/}foo.bat"
3.3.3 Assigning Permissions
When loading a new class that originated from a particular CodeSource, the security mechanism consults the policy object to determine what permissions to grant. This is done by invoking the "getPermissions()" method of the Policy class.
Clearly, a given code source can match (the code source given in) multiple entries in the policy, for example because the wildcard "*" is allowed.
The following algorithm is used to locate the appropriate set of permissions in the policy.
1. match the public keys, if code is signed.
2. if a key is not recognized in the policy, ignore the key
if every key is ignored, treat the code as unsigned.
3. if the keys are matched, or no signer was specified {
try to match all URLs in the policy for the keys
}
4. if either key or URL is not matched, use built-in default
permission, which is the original sandbox permission.
The URL of a code source matches a second URL in a policy entry if the second URL is a prefix of the first URL. For example, given "http://java.sun.com" in the policy, then any code base that is on this web site matches the policy entry. Matching code bases include "http://java.sun.com/jdk/" and "http://java.sun.com/people/gong/index.html".
If multiple entries are matched, then all the permissions given in those entries are granted. In other words, permission assignment is additive. For example, if code signed with key A gets permission X and code signed by key B gets permission Y, then code signed by both A and B gets permissions X and Y. Similarly, if URL "http://java.sun.com" is given permission X, and "http://java.sun.com/people" is given permission Y, then an applet from "http://java.sun.com/people/gong" gets both X and Y (assuming that the signers match).
Note that URL matching here is purely syntactic. For example, a policy can give an entry that specifies a URL "ftp://ftp.sun.com". Such an entry is useful only when one can obtain Java code directly from ftp for execution.
To specify URLs for the local file system, a file URL can be used. For example, to specify files in the /home/cathy/temp directory in a Solaris sytem, you'd use
"file:/home/cathy/temp/*"
To specify files in the "temp" directory on the C drive in a Windows system, use
"file:/c:/temp/*"
Note: code base URLs always use slashes (no backlashes), regardless of the platform they apply to.
You can also use an absolute path name such as
"/home/gong/bin/MyWonderfulJava"
3.3.4 Default System and User Policy Files
In the default Policy implementation, the policy can be specified within one or more policy configuration files. The configuration file(s) specify what permissions are allowed for code from specified code sources.
A policy file can be composed via a simple text editor, or via a graphical policytool that is described later.
There is by default a single system-wide policy file, and a single user policy file.
The system policy file is by default located at
{java.home}/lib/security/java.policy (Solaris)
{java.home}\lib\security\java.policy (Windows)
where java.home is a system property specifying the directory into which the JDK was installed.
The user policy file is by default located at
{user.home}/.java.policy (Solaris)
{user.home}\.java.policy (Windows)
where user.home is a system property specifying the user's home directory.
When the Policy is initialized, the system policy is loaded in first, and then the user policy is added to it. If neither policy is present, a built-in policy is used. This built-in policy is the same as the original sandbox policy.
Policy file locations are specified in the security properties file, which is located at
{java.home}/lib/security/java.security (Solaris)
{java.home}\lib/security\java.security (Windows)
The policy file locations are specified as the values of properties whose names are of the form
policy.url.n
where "n" is a number. For example, the default system and user policy files are defined in the security properties file as
policy.url.1=${java.home}/lib/security/java.policy
policy.url.2=${user.home}/.java.policy
You can actually specify a number of URLs (including ones of the form "http://"), and all the designated policy files will get loaded. You can also comment out or change the second one to disable reading the default user policy file.
The algorithm starts at policy.url.1, and keeps incrementing until it does not find a URL. Thus if you have policy.url.1 and policy.url.3, policy.url.3 will never be read.
It is also possible to specify an additional or a different policy file when invoking execution of an application. This can be done via the "-Djava.security.policy" command-line argument, which sets the value of the java.security.policy property. For example, if you use
java -Djava.security.manager -Djava.security.policy=pURL SomeApp
where pURL is a URL specifying the location of a policy file, then the specified policy file will be loaded in addition to all the policy files that are specified in the security properties file. (The "-Djava.security.manager" argument ensures that the default security manager is installed, and thus the application is subject to policy checks, as described in "Security Management for Applets and Applications". It is not required if the application SomeApp installs a security manager.)
If you use
java -Djava.security.manager -Djava.security.policy==pURL SomeApp
(note the double equals) then just the specified policy file will be used; all others will be ignored.
If you want to pass a policy file to the appletviewer, again use a "-Djava.security.policy" argument as follows:
appletviewer -J-Djava.security.policy=pURL myApplet
Please note: The "-Djava.security.policy" policy file value will be ignored (for both java and appletviewer commands) if the "policy.allowSystemProperty" property in the security properties file is set to false. The default is true.
3.3.5 Customizing Policy Evaluation
The current design of the Policy class is not as comprehensive as it could be. We have given the issues much thought and are progressing cautiously, partly to ensure that we define method calls that are appropriate for the most common cases. For the meantime, an alternative policy class can be given to replace the default policy class, as long as the former is a subclass of the abstract Policy class and implements the "getPermissions()" method (and other methods as necessary).
The default Policy implementation can be changed by resetting the value of the "policy.provider" security property (in the security properties file) to the fully qualified name of the desired Policy implementation class. The security properties file is located in the file named
{java.home}/lib/security/java.security
where {java.home} refers to the directory where the JDK was installed.
The property policy.provider specifies the name of the policy class, and the default is the following:
policy.provider=sun.security.provider.PolicyFile
To customize, you can change the property value to specify another class, as in
policy.provider=com.mycom.MyPolicy
Note that the MyPolicy class must be a subclass of java.security.Policy. It is perhaps worth emphasizing that such an override of the policy class is a temporary solution and a more comprehensive policy API will probably make this unnecessary.
CONTENTS | PREV
| NEXT
Copyright © 1997-1998 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.