CSE 333 24su Homework 4

Due:   Wednesday, August 14th, 2024 by 11:00 pm


Goals & Implementation Notes

In this assignment you will build on your HW3 implementation to implement a multithreaded Web server front-end to your query processor. In Part A, you will read through some of our code to learn about the infrastructure we have built for you. In Part B, you will complete some of our classes and routines to finish the implementation of a simple Web server. In Part C, you will fix some security problems in our Web server.

As before, please read through this entire document before beginning the assignment, and please start early!

General Implementation Notes

  • In HW4, as with HW2 and HW3, you don't need to worry about propagating errors back to callers in all situations. You will use Verify333()'s to spot some kinds of errors and cause your program to crash. However, no matter what a client does, or what input the web server reads, your web server must handle that; only internal issues (such as out of memory) should cause your web server to crash out.
  • As before, you may not modify any of the existing header files or class definitions distributed with the code. If you wish to add extra "helper" functions you can to do that by including additional static functions in the implementation (.cc) files.
  • You also may not modify the Makefile distributed with the project. In particular, there are reasonable ways to do the necessary string handling without using the Boost Regex library.

Suggested Work Schedule

To help you schedule your time, here's a suggested order for the parts of this assignment. We're not going to enforce a schedule; it's up to you to manage your time.

  • Read over the project specifications and understand which code is responsible for what.

  • Finish ServerSocket.cc. Make sure to cover all functionality, not just what is in the unit tests.

  • Implement FileReader.cc, which should be very easy, and GetNextRequest() in HttpConnection.cc.

  • Complete ParseRequest() in HttpConnection.cc. This can be tricky, as it involves both Boost and string parsing.

  • Finish the code for http333d.cc. Implement HttpServer_ThrFn() in HttpServer.cc.

  • Complete ProcessFileRequest() and ProcessQueryRequest() in HttpServer.cc. At this point, you should be able to search the "333gle" site and view the webpages available under /static/, e.g. http://localhost:5555/static/bikeapalooza_2011/index.html.

  • Fix the security issues with the website, if you have any.

  • Make sure everything works as it is supposed to.


Multithreaded Web Server

Part A: Read Through Our Code

Our web server is a fairly straightforward multithreaded application. Every time a client connects to the server, the server dispatches a thread to handle all interactions with that client. Threads do not interact with each other at all, which greatly simplifies the design of the server.

The figure to the right shows the high-level architecture of the server. There is a main class called HttpServer that uses a ServerSocket class to create a listening socket, and then sits in a loop waiting to accept new connections from clients. For each new connection that the HttpServer receives, it dispatches a thread from a ThreadPool class to handle the connection. The dispatched thread springs to life in a function called HttpServer_ThrFn() within the HttpServer.cc file.



The HttpServer_ThrFn() function handles reading requests from one client. For each request that the client sends, the HttpServer_ThrFn() invokes GetNextRequest() on the HttpConnection object to read in the next request and parse it.

To read a request, the GetNextRequest() method invokes WrappedRead() some number of times until it spots the end of the request. To parse a request, the method invokes the ParseRequest() method (also within HttpConnection). At this point, the HttpServer_ThrFun() has a fully parsed HttpRequest object (defined in HttpRequest.h).



The next job of HttpServer_ThrFn() is to process the request. To do this, it invokes the ProcessRequest() function, which looks at the request URI to determine if this is a request for a static file, or if it is a request associated with the search functionality. Depending on what it discovers, it either invokes ProcessFileRequest() or ProcessSearchRequest().

Once those functions return an HttpResponse, the HttpServer_ThrFn() invokes the WriteResponse() method on the HttpConnection object to write the response back to the client.



Our web server isn't too complicated, but there is a fair amount of plumbing to get set up. In this part of the assignment, we want you to read through a bunch of lower-level code that we've provided for you. You need to understand how this code works to finish our web server implementation, but we won't have you modify this plumbing.

Instructions

  1. Change to a directory with your local copy of your CSE 333 gitlab repository, which has your hw1/, hw2/, hw3/, and projdocs/ directories in it. Use git pull to retrieve the new hw4/ folder with the starter code for this assignment. You will need the hw1/, hw2, and hw3/ directories in the same folder as your new hw4/ folder since hw4 links to files in those previous directories. Also, as with previous parts of the project, you can use the solution_binaries/ versions of the previous parts of the project if you wish.

  2. Run make to compile the HW4 binaries. One of them is the usual unit test binary called test_suite. Run it, and you'll see the unit tests fail, crash out, and you won't yet earn the automated grading points tallied by the test suite. The second binary is the web server itself: http333d. Try running it to see its command line arguments. When you're ready to run it for real, you can use a command like:
    ./http333d 5555 ../projdocs unit_test_indices/*
    (You might need to pick a different port than 5555 if someone else is using that port on the same machine as you.)

    Try using our solution_binaries server, and running it using a similar command line:

    ./solution_binaries/http333d 5555 ../projdocs unit_test_indices/*

    Next, use a web browser to explore what the server should look like when it's finished:

    1. If you are running the code on a lab computer or the CSE Home VM: Launch Firefox or Chrome on that machine, visit http://localhost:5555/, and try issuing some searches. As well, visit http://localhost:5555/static/bikeapalooza_2011/Bikeapalooza.html and click around. This is what your finished web server will be capable of.
    2. If you are running the code on attu over an SSH connection: Follow the same steps as above, but navigate to the address for the instance of attu your code is running on. For example, if you are running your code on attu4, you would visit the following addresses: http://attu4.cs.washington.edu:5555/ and http://attu4.cs.washington.edu:5555/static/bikeapalooza_2011/Bikeapalooza.html

    When you are done with the http333d server, the most graceful way to shut it down is to open another terminal window on the same machine and run the command

    kill pid
    where pid is the server process id. Use the ps -u command on the same machine (attu or local VM) to find that process id. You also can probably shut down the server by typing control-C in the window where it is running, but this isn't as graceful and doesn't always work as reliably as a kill command.

  3. Read through ThreadPool.h and ThreadPool.cc. You don't need to implement anything in either, but several pieces of the project rely on this code. The header file is well-documented, so it ought to be clear how it's used. (There's also a unit test file that you can peek at.)

  4. Read through HttpUtils.h and HttpUtils.cc. This class defines a number of utility functions that the rest of HW4 uses. You will have to implement some of these utilities. Make sure that you understand what each of them does, and why.

  5. Finally, read through HttpRequest.h and HttpResponse.h. These files define the HttpRequest and HttpResponse classes, which represent a parsed HTTP request and response, respectively.

It's time to start coding in Part B.


Part B: Basic Web Server

You are now going to finish a basic implementation of the http333d web server. You will need to implement some of the event handling routines at different layers of abstraction in the web server, culiminating with generating HTTP and HTML to send to the client.

Instructions

  1. Take a look at ServerSocket.h. This file contains a helpful class for creating a server-side listening socket, and accepting a new connection from a client. We've provided you with the class declaration in ServerSocket.h but no implementation in ServerSocket.cc; your next job is to build it. You'll need to make the code handle both IPv4 and IPv6 clients. Run the test_suite to see if you make it past the ServerSocket unittests.

  2. Read through FileReader.h and FileReader.cc. Note that the implementation of FileReader.cc is missing; go ahead and implement it. See if you make it past the FileReader unittests.

  3. Read through HttpConnection.h and HttpConnection.cc. The two major functions in HttpConnection.cc have their implementations missing, but have generous comments for you to follow. Implement the missing functions, and see if you make it past the HttpConnection unittests.

  4. Read through HttpUtils.h and HttpUtils.cc. There are two functions in HttpUtils.cc that have their implementations missing, but have generouts comments to help you figure out their implementation. Implement the missing functions, and see if you make it past the HttpUtils unittests.

  5. Read through HttpServer.cc, HttpServer.h, and http333d.cc. Note that some parts of HttpServer.cc and http333d.cc are missing. Go ahead and implement those missing functions. Once you have them working, test your http333d binary to see if it works. Make sure you exercise both the web search functionality as well as the static file serving functionality. You'll probably need to look at the source of pages that our solution binary serves and emulate that HTML to get the same "look and feel" to your server as ours. If you wish, you can change the appearance of the front page ("dark mode", different graphics, etc.) but you should not change or add to the functionality of the server beyond the appearance now. If you want to do more, see the Bonus section, below.

At this point, your web server should run correctly, and everything should compile with no warnings. Try running your web server and connecting to it from a browser as described above. Also try running the test_suite under valgrind to make sure there are no memory issues. Finally, launch the web server under valgrind to make sure there are no issues or leaks; after the web server has launched, exercise it by issuing a few queries, then kill the web server. (The supplied code does have some leaks, but your code should not make things significantly worse.)


Part C: Fix Security Vulnerabilities

Now that the basic web server works, you will discover that your web server (probably) has two security vulnerabilities. We are going to point these out to you, and you will repair them.

Instructions

It's likely at this point that your implementation has two security flaws. (However, please note: it is possible that the way you implemented things above means you have already dealt with these flaws). You may find that some of the functions defined in HttpUtils.cc will be very helpful in fixing these security flaws in your web server.

  • The first is called a "cross-site scripting" flaw. See this for background if you're curious: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-site_scripting
    Try typing the following query into our example web server, and into your web server, and compare the two. (Note: do this with Firefox or Safari; it turns out that Chrome will attempt to help out web servers by preventing this attack from the client-side!)
    hello <script>alert("Boo!");</script>
    To fix this flaw, you need "escape" untrusted input from the client before you relay it to output. We've provided you with an escape function in HttpUtils.

  • Use telnet or nc to connect to your web server, and manually send a request for the following URL. (Browsers are smart enough to help defend against this attack, so you can't just type it into the URL bar, but nothing prevents attackers from directly connecting to your server with a program of their own!)
    /static/../hw4/http333d.cc
    This is called a directory traversal attack. Instead of trusting the file pathname provided by a client, you need to normalize the path and verify that it names a file within your document subdirectory tree (which would be ../projdocs/ if the example command shown in part A was used to start the server). If the file path names something outside of that subdirectory, you should return an error message instead of the file contents. We've provided you with a function in HttpUtils.h to help you test to see if a path is safe or not.

Fix these two security flaws, assuming they do in fact exist in your server. As a point of reference, in solution_binaries/, we've provided a version of our web server that has both of these flaws in place (http333d_withflaws). Feel free to try it out, but DO NOT leave this server running, as it will potentially expose all of your files to anybody that connects to it.

Congrats, you're done with the CSE 333 project sequence!!


Bonus

There are two bonus tasks for this assignment. As before, you can do them, or not; if you don't, there will be no negative impact on your grade. You should not attempt either bonus task unless and until the basic assignment is working properly. We will not award any bonus credit if the basic assignment is not substantially correct.

If you want to do any of the bonus parts, first create a hw4-final tag in your repository to mark the version of the assignment with the required parts of the project. That will allow us to more easily evaluate how well you did on the basic requirements of the assignment.

Then, when you are done adding additional bonus parts, create a new tag hw4-bonus after committing and pushing your additions, and push the new tag to your GitLab repository. If we find a hw4-bonus tag in your repository we'll grade the extra credit parts; otherwise we'll assume that you just did the required parts.

If you do any of the bonus parts, you should add a file named readme_bonus.txt in your top-level hw4 directory giving a brief summary of the additions in your project and how to use them..

  • The first bonus task is to perform a performance analysis of your web server implementation, determining what throughput your server can handle (measured both in requests per second and bytes per second), what latency clients experience (measure in seconds per request), and what the performance bottleneck is. You might want to look at the httperf tool for Linux to generate synthetic load.

    You should conduct this performance analysis for a few different usage scenarios; e.g., you could vary the size of the web page you request, and see its impact on the number of pages per second your server can deliver. If you choose to do this bonus task, please include a PDF file in your submission containing relevant performance graphs and analysis.

  • The second bonus task is to figure out some interesting feature to add to your web server, and implement it! As one idea, find the implementation of a "chat bot", such as Eliza, and add it to your web server. As another idea, implement logging functionality; every time your server serves content, write out some record with a timestamp to a log file; make the log file available through the web server itself. As a third idea, change the results page to show context from matching documents, similar to how Google shows excerpts from matching pages; specifically, make it so that each result in the result list shows:
    x words + <bold>hit word</bold> + y words
    for one or more of the query words that hit.

    This part of the assignment is deliberately open-ended, with much less structure than earlier parts. The (small) amount of extra credit granted will depend on how interesting your extension is and how well it is implemented.




Testing

As with previous homeworks, you compile your implementation using the make command. This will result in several output files, including an executable called test_suite. You can run all of the tests in that suite with the usual command:

bash$ ./test_suite

You can also run only specific tests by passing command line arguments into test_suite. For example, to only run the HttpConnection tests, you can type:

bash$ ./test_suite --gtest_filter=Test_HttpConnection.*

In general, you can specify which tests are run for any of the tests in the assignment; you just need to know the names of the tests, which can be obtained by running:

bash$ ./test_suite --gtest_list_tests

You can also run test_suite and specify particular tests that should NOT be run. For instance, the ServerSocket tests can take a while to run; to run all tests expect for those, enter

bash$ ./test_suite --gtest_filter=-Test_ServerSocket.*

These settings can be helpful for debugging specific parts of the assignment, especially since test_suite can be run with these settings through valgrind and gdb!



Code Quality

In addition to passing tests, your code should be high quality and readable. This includes several aspects:

  • Modularity: Your code should be divided into reasonable modules (e.g., functions) and should not have excessive redundancies that could be removed by replacing redundant code with calls to suitable, possibly new, functions. If you create any additional private (e.g., static) helper functions, be sure to provide good comments that explain the function inputs, outputs, and behavior. These comments can often be relatively brief as long as they convey to the reader the information needed to understand how to use the function and what it does when executed.
  • Readability: Your code should blend smoothly with the code surrounding it. Follow the existing conventions in the code for capitalization; naming of functions, variables, and other items; using comments to document aspects of the code; and layout conventions such as indenting and spacing.
  • Bug checker/linter: Use the cpplint.py --clint tool to check for style issues and common coding bugs. Be sure to fix issues reported before submitting your code. Exception: if cpplint reports style problems in the supplied starter code, you should leave that code as-is.
  • Style guide: Refer to the Google C++ Style Guide for advice.




Submission

When you are ready to turn in your assignment, you should follow the same procedures you used for previous assignments, except this time tag the repository with hw4-final. Remember to clean up, commit, and push all necessary files to your repository before you add the tag and push it. After you have created and pushed the tag, remember to test everything by creating a new clone of the repository in a separate, empty directory, checkout the hw4-final tag, and verifying that everything works as expected on the CSE Linux environment. Refer to the hw0 turnin instructions for details, and follow those steps carefully.

If you fail to check your work and your project doesn't build properly when the same steps are done by the course staff to grade it, you may lose a huge amount of the possible credit for the assignment even if almost absolutely everything is actually correct.

If you do any of the bonus parts, create an additional hw4-bonus tag and push that after adding and pushing the bonus code to the repository. Be sure to clone the repo, checkout that tag, and verify that everything works as expected. Also verify that the hw4-final tag is still present and that it includes (only) the required parts of the project.

As with previous parts of the project, when you clone your repository to check it, it will normally not include previous solution files like hw1/libhw1.a. You should either run make in the hw1 through hw3 directories to recreate those archives, or else copy the versions from the solution_binaries folders into the right places. These are needed for you to build and test hw4.




Grading

We will be basing your grade on several elements:

  • The degree to which your code passes the unit tests. If your code fails a test, we won't attempt to understand why: we're planning on just including the number of points that the test drivers print out.

  • We have some additional unit tests that test a few additional cases that aren't in the supplied test drivers. We'll be checking to see if your code passes these.

  • The quality and readability of your code. We'll be judging this on several qualitative aspects described above.

  • Both code correctness and code quality matter. Both are weighed significantly in the evaluation of your project.