Using the right word speeds learning and helps getting help |
Learning le mot juste, the right word for something, aids us in two ways: | ||
Help Learning ... our brains seem to anchor concepts to words & phrases | ||
Getting Help ... asking “tech support” for help or using online HELP requires us to describe the problem precisely |
Probably familiar terms … | ||
screen saver | ||
monitor | ||
pixel | ||
RGB | ||
motherboard | ||
[micro]processor | ||
[RAM]memory |
Hardware refers to physical devices; software refers to programs, the instructions directing a computer | ||
The main difference is: hardware cannot be changed, while the software can be modified | ||
The same hardware (computer) runs different software (applications) |
A mnemonic is any memory aid | ||
In IT we try to avoid remembering or memorizing, but sometimes we must … mnemonics can help | ||
Definitions for “tangible” parts of IT -- RGB, pixel,... -- are found in glossaries | |||
A glossary is in the back of FIT | |||
Online glossaries are handy … locate one | |||
A useful study aid is to start a document where you store the definitions of the new words you encounter -- later in the term we will show how to set up a DB for them |
Definitions for “tangible” parts of IT -- RGB, pixel,... -- are found in glossaries | |||
A glossary is in the back of FIT | |||
Online glossaries are handy … locate one | |||
A useful study aid is to start a document where you store the definitions of the new words you encounter -- later in the term we will show how to set up a DB for them | |||
… the “intangible” words of IT are even more important |
abstract = extract or remove something | |||
“Beppo abstracted the statue as Holmes, LeStrade and I watched” | |||
In FIT100 abstracting will usually involve removing the core idea or process from a specific situation -- fables | |||
The “thing removed” is an abstraction | |||
Humans abstract core ideas, principles, rules, themes, etc. naturally | |||
“In Kim’s chem class the professor assigned challenge problems worth extra credit, but each week Kim couldn’t do them and asked for help. The teacher said, ‘Don’t give up, attempt the problem again each day.’ Kim followed the advice and was eventually able to solve the problems.” | |||
Abstracting from the situation: A good problem-solving technique is to return later to a problem. | |||
Some aspects are relevant | |||
Some aspects are irrelevant |
generalize = infer a rule | |||
suppose you notice that faucets | |||
turn to the left to turn the water on, and | |||
turn to the right to turn the water off | |||
to infer that all faucets do so is to generalize | |||
Are there other examples? |
generalize v. infer a rule | |||
suppose you notice that faucets | |||
turn to the left to turn the water on, and | |||
turn to the right to turn the water off | |||
to infer that all faucets do so is to generalize | |||
Are there other examples? | |||
Other knobs, screws, nuts/bolts, ... |
Noticing how devices operate simplifies their use | ||
Observation: Computers give feedback when they are working | ||
Noticing how devices operate simplifies their use | |||
Observation: Computers give feedback when they are working | |||
So, if you think you’re waiting for the computer but there is no feedback, it’s waiting for you |
Consider running a mile … | |||
How fast can anyone run a mile? | |||
In 1999 Hakim El Guerrouj ran it in 3:43.13 | |||
Compare with Roger Bannister | |||
In 1954 Bannister ran a mile in 3.59.4 | |||
Express speed | |||
as a rate: | |||
In 45 years the mile run got 7% faster |
Compared to normal people ... | |||
How fast can you run a mile? | |||
Healthy people in their twenties … ~7:30 | |||
That is, El Guerrouj is twice as fast as us | |||
As a rate, 7:30 is 8 mph | |||
El Guerrouj is about a factor-of-2 faster than normal people ... |
How fast do computers run? Measure + | ||
Univac I ran 100,000 adds/sec in 1954 |
How fast do computers run? Measure + | |||
Univac I ran 100,000 adds/sec in 1954 | |||
My IBM runs about 500,000,000 adds | |||
A factor-of-5,000 improvement |
How fast do computers run? Measure + | |||
Univac I ran 100,000 adds/sec in 1954 | |||
My IBM runs about 500,000,000 adds | |||
A factor-of-5,000 improvement | |||
ASCI Red ran 2,100,000,000,000 adds in 1999 | |||
A factor-of-21 Million improvement |
How fast do computers run? Measure + | |||
Univac I ran 100,000 adds/sec in 1954 | |||
My IBM runs about 500,000,000 adds | |||
A factor-of-5,000 improvement | |||
ASCI Red ran 2,100,000,000,000 adds in 1999 | |||
A factor-of-21 Million improvement | |||
Can we comprehend such speeds or factors of improvement??? |
A factor of improvement is different than a percent improvement … | |||
factor = new_rate/old_rate | |||
percent = 100 x (new_rate-old_rate)/old_rate | |||
Expressing an improvement by it’s factor is easier, esp. for large changes | |||
El Guerrouj’s 7% improvement over Bannister is a 1.07 factor of improvement |
One reason to notice the factors of improvement is to recognize scale | |||
The time for the mile run has improved | |||
Maximum adds per second has improved |
One reason to notice the factors of improvement is to recognize scale | |||
The time for the mile run has improved | |||
Maximum adds per second has improved | |||
But the difference in scale is dramatic | |||
A factor-of-1.07 for the mile run | |||
A factor-of-21,000,000 for additions |
One reason to notice the factors of improvement is to recognize scale | |||
The time for the mile run has improved | |||
Maximum adds per second has improved | |||
But the difference in scale is dramatic | |||
A factor-of-1.07 for the mile run | |||
A factor-of-21,000,000 for additions |
It is essential to learn the vocabulary of a new field | |||
Words of tangible aspects of IT have definitions in glossaries | |||
Words for the intangible are key | |||
Abstract | |||
Generalize | |||
Operationally Attuned | |||
Being analytical is key to understanding |